The persian version of mhealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ) for patients: a psychometric assessment study.

IF 3.3 3区医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s12911-025-02882-3

Khadijeh Moulaei, Fatemeh Dinari, Abbas Sheikhtaheri, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy, Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari

{"title":"The persian version of mhealth app usability questionnaire (MAUQ) for patients: a psychometric assessment study.","authors":"Khadijeh Moulaei, Fatemeh Dinari, Abbas Sheikhtaheri, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy, Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02882-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The growing importance of mobile apps in osteoporosis management highlights the crucial need for evaluating their utility and usability, particularly for Osteoporosis support apps. Addressing this need, the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) was crafted in four different versions, categorized based on the nature of the app (interactive or standalone) and the intended user (patient or provider). Due to its usage by diverse users with varying languages, this questionnaire requires psychometric assessment in multiple languages. This study aimed to translate and validate the Persian version of MAUQ for patients.Method: After translating the standalone and interactive versions of MAUQ into the Persian language, face validity, content validity, and factor analysis were conducted. Ten patients with osteoporosis were involved for face validity, and ten experts in medical informatics and health information technology were invited to assess content validity by completing a questionnaire. A total of 99 patients with osteoporosis participated in the factor analysis. The reliability of the questionnaires was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha.Results: The face validity and the content of the Persian version of MAUQ were confirmed. Factor analysis of the standalone version of MAUQ showed 18 items in three dimensions: easy to use (7 items), user interface and satisfaction (6 items), and usefulness (5 items). Factor analysis of the interactive version of MAUQ showed 21 items in two dimensions: easy to use and satisfaction (11 items) and information arrangement and usefulness (10 items). The Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire for standalone and interactive applications was 0.90.Conclusion: The psychometric assessment of the Persian MAUQ established its validity and reliability among osteoporosis patients, affirming its efficacy as a robust tool for evaluating mHealth app usability.","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02882-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The growing importance of mobile apps in osteoporosis management highlights the crucial need for evaluating their utility and usability, particularly for Osteoporosis support apps. Addressing this need, the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) was crafted in four different versions, categorized based on the nature of the app (interactive or standalone) and the intended user (patient or provider). Due to its usage by diverse users with varying languages, this questionnaire requires psychometric assessment in multiple languages. This study aimed to translate and validate the Persian version of MAUQ for patients.

Method: After translating the standalone and interactive versions of MAUQ into the Persian language, face validity, content validity, and factor analysis were conducted. Ten patients with osteoporosis were involved for face validity, and ten experts in medical informatics and health information technology were invited to assess content validity by completing a questionnaire. A total of 99 patients with osteoporosis participated in the factor analysis. The reliability of the questionnaires was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The face validity and the content of the Persian version of MAUQ were confirmed. Factor analysis of the standalone version of MAUQ showed 18 items in three dimensions: easy to use (7 items), user interface and satisfaction (6 items), and usefulness (5 items). Factor analysis of the interactive version of MAUQ showed 21 items in two dimensions: easy to use and satisfaction (11 items) and information arrangement and usefulness (10 items). The Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire for standalone and interactive applications was 0.90.

Conclusion: The psychometric assessment of the Persian MAUQ established its validity and reliability among osteoporosis patients, affirming its efficacy as a robust tool for evaluating mHealth app usability.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 医学-医学：信息

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

5.70%

发文量

297

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.