The divergent response of fungal and bacterial necromass carbon in soil aggregates under biochar amendment in paddy soil

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Mengtao Zhu, Zhiwei Liu, Qi Yi, Ruiling Ma, Man Xu, Kaiyue Song, Rongjun Bian, Jufeng Zheng, Xuhui Zhang
{"title":"The divergent response of fungal and bacterial necromass carbon in soil aggregates under biochar amendment in paddy soil","authors":"Mengtao Zhu, Zhiwei Liu, Qi Yi, Ruiling Ma, Man Xu, Kaiyue Song, Rongjun Bian, Jufeng Zheng, Xuhui Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07228-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Microbial necromass carbon (C) significantly contributes to soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. However, there is limited information on how biochar amendment affects the accumulation and allocation of microbial necromass C in soil aggregates in paddy soil remains scarce, particularly with regard to changes in microbial life strategies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>From a 2-year field experiment, topsoil samples with biochar (C15) and without biochar amendment (C0) treatments were collected and fractionated into macroaggregate (2000–250 μm), microaggregate (250–53 μm), and silt–clay (&lt; 53 μm) fractions. We investigated the impact of maize straw-derived biochar amendment on microbial community structure, SOC, and microbial necromass C in paddy soil aggregates.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Biochar amendment significantly increased SOC and microbial biomass C but reduced microbial necromass C concentration. The microbial community shifted towards K-strategists under biochar amendment. Compared with the C0 treatment, total necromass C concentration in the C15 treatment decreased by 14.9% in the bulk soil, primarily due to reductions in fungal and bacterial necromass C concentrations of 14.7% and 16.1%, respectively. The decrease in total necromass C was primarily observed in macroaggregate and microaggregate. Specially, fungal necromass C primarily decreased in macroaggregate, while bacterial necromass C decreased in microaggregate. Biochar amendment did not significantly reduce microbial necromass C in silt–clay fraction, indicating its greater stabilization due to strong binding with soil minerals under biochar amendment, thereby protects it from microbial decomposition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results offer new insights into the role of soil aggregates in microbial-mediated SOC sequestration following biochar amendment in paddy soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07228-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Microbial necromass carbon (C) significantly contributes to soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. However, there is limited information on how biochar amendment affects the accumulation and allocation of microbial necromass C in soil aggregates in paddy soil remains scarce, particularly with regard to changes in microbial life strategies.

Methods

From a 2-year field experiment, topsoil samples with biochar (C15) and without biochar amendment (C0) treatments were collected and fractionated into macroaggregate (2000–250 μm), microaggregate (250–53 μm), and silt–clay (< 53 μm) fractions. We investigated the impact of maize straw-derived biochar amendment on microbial community structure, SOC, and microbial necromass C in paddy soil aggregates.

Results

Biochar amendment significantly increased SOC and microbial biomass C but reduced microbial necromass C concentration. The microbial community shifted towards K-strategists under biochar amendment. Compared with the C0 treatment, total necromass C concentration in the C15 treatment decreased by 14.9% in the bulk soil, primarily due to reductions in fungal and bacterial necromass C concentrations of 14.7% and 16.1%, respectively. The decrease in total necromass C was primarily observed in macroaggregate and microaggregate. Specially, fungal necromass C primarily decreased in macroaggregate, while bacterial necromass C decreased in microaggregate. Biochar amendment did not significantly reduce microbial necromass C in silt–clay fraction, indicating its greater stabilization due to strong binding with soil minerals under biochar amendment, thereby protects it from microbial decomposition.

Conclusions

The results offer new insights into the role of soil aggregates in microbial-mediated SOC sequestration following biochar amendment in paddy soil.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信