Functions of communication during emergency care of children with medical complexity: Caregiver perspectives.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia A Ciurria, Jennifer Reyes Lin, Cassandra M Pruitt, Bryan A Sisk
{"title":"Functions of communication during emergency care of children with medical complexity: Caregiver perspectives.","authors":"Julia A Ciurria, Jennifer Reyes Lin, Cassandra M Pruitt, Bryan A Sisk","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated communication experiences of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) during emergency care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen caregivers of CMC participated in semi-structured interviews regarding communication while seeking care for their child in the emergency department (ED). Thematic analysis was applied using a previously established functional communication model as an a priori framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the previously established 8 core functions of communication were identified in this population. \"Building relationships\" manifested as clinicians soliciting caregiver input and responding to the needs of the caregiver. \"Exchanging information\" included clearly explaining next steps to caregivers. \"Responding to emotions\" acknowledged the inherent distress of seeking emergency care. \"Providing validation\" included recognizing caregivers as the expert of their own child. \"Enabling self-management\" manifested as identifying caregiver needs and directing toward resources. \"Making decisions\" manifested as involving caregivers in the decision-making process and recognizing caregiver decision fatigue. \"Managing uncertainty\" involved developing plans with caregivers. \"Supporting hope\" was the least commonly described function and manifested as emphasizing positive aspects of a child's condition. Many caregivers described negative communication experiences in which their concerns and insights were unheard or invalidated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caregivers of CMC described communication experiences and goals that align with 8 communication functions that were identified in other serious childhood illnesses with unique operationalizations.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>This communication framework can support ED clinicians in better understanding the communication needs of caregivers of CMC during emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"134 ","pages":"108667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.108667","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated communication experiences of caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC) during emergency care.

Methods: Fifteen caregivers of CMC participated in semi-structured interviews regarding communication while seeking care for their child in the emergency department (ED). Thematic analysis was applied using a previously established functional communication model as an a priori framework.

Results: Each of the previously established 8 core functions of communication were identified in this population. "Building relationships" manifested as clinicians soliciting caregiver input and responding to the needs of the caregiver. "Exchanging information" included clearly explaining next steps to caregivers. "Responding to emotions" acknowledged the inherent distress of seeking emergency care. "Providing validation" included recognizing caregivers as the expert of their own child. "Enabling self-management" manifested as identifying caregiver needs and directing toward resources. "Making decisions" manifested as involving caregivers in the decision-making process and recognizing caregiver decision fatigue. "Managing uncertainty" involved developing plans with caregivers. "Supporting hope" was the least commonly described function and manifested as emphasizing positive aspects of a child's condition. Many caregivers described negative communication experiences in which their concerns and insights were unheard or invalidated.

Conclusion: Caregivers of CMC described communication experiences and goals that align with 8 communication functions that were identified in other serious childhood illnesses with unique operationalizations.

Practice implications: This communication framework can support ED clinicians in better understanding the communication needs of caregivers of CMC during emergency care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信