Correction to “Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis”

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70059
{"title":"Correction to “Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ogura K, Ichijima R, Ikehara H et al. Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis. <i>DEN Open</i> 2024; <b>5</b>: e412.</p><p>In Tables 1 and 2, the <i>N</i> = 206 for the midazolam group and the <i>N</i> = 60 for the remimazolam group are incorrect. The correct numbers are <i>N</i> = 208 and <i>N</i> = 40. Accordingly, the adverse event rate for the remimazolam group in Table 2 is <i>n</i> = 1, 2.5%, and the correct <i>p</i>-value is 0.16.</p><p>The correct Table 1 and Table 2 are as follow.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ogura K, Ichijima R, Ikehara H et al. Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis. DEN Open 2024; 5: e412.

In Tables 1 and 2, the N = 206 for the midazolam group and the N = 60 for the remimazolam group are incorrect. The correct numbers are N = 208 and N = 40. Accordingly, the adverse event rate for the remimazolam group in Table 2 is n = 1, 2.5%, and the correct p-value is 0.16.

The correct Table 1 and Table 2 are as follow.

We apologize for this error.

更正“日本患者结肠镜检查时雷马唑仑和咪达唑仑镇静作用的比较:倾向评分匹配分析”。
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1002/deo2.412.]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信