Theory-driven assessment of cognitive flexibility in bulimia nervosa: a preliminary study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Eyal Heled, Karen Goshen, Talma Kushnir, Eitan Gur, Shani Maron-Olerasho
{"title":"Theory-driven assessment of cognitive flexibility in bulimia nervosa: a preliminary study.","authors":"Eyal Heled, Karen Goshen, Talma Kushnir, Eitan Gur, Shani Maron-Olerasho","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2024.2442606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive flexibility (CF) is defined as the ability to switch efficiently between different concepts or tasks. Empirical evidence of CF in individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN), offers conflicting conclusions, attributed to how CF is conceptualized and operationalized. The aims of the current study were to compare CF performance of women with BN to healthy controls, utilising a CF model that includes three subtypes termed: task switching, switching sets and stimulus-response mapping. In addition, to examine the association between CF subtypes and BN clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two women (twenty-eight with BN and thirty-four healthy controls) with a mean age of 24.4, completed a CF cognitive battery. Performance was measured by response time and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BN group's response time was worse only on task switching, but was significantly more accurate on stimulus-response mapping. There was no significant correlation between CF scores and BN clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with BN present with an impairment only on higher CF demands, whereas their performance at lower-level CF tends to be more accurate. Additionally, CF is independent of clinical characteristics, thus supporting evidence that it may reflect a trait nature in BN.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2024.2442606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive flexibility (CF) is defined as the ability to switch efficiently between different concepts or tasks. Empirical evidence of CF in individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN), offers conflicting conclusions, attributed to how CF is conceptualized and operationalized. The aims of the current study were to compare CF performance of women with BN to healthy controls, utilising a CF model that includes three subtypes termed: task switching, switching sets and stimulus-response mapping. In addition, to examine the association between CF subtypes and BN clinical characteristics.

Methods: Sixty-two women (twenty-eight with BN and thirty-four healthy controls) with a mean age of 24.4, completed a CF cognitive battery. Performance was measured by response time and accuracy.

Results: The BN group's response time was worse only on task switching, but was significantly more accurate on stimulus-response mapping. There was no significant correlation between CF scores and BN clinical characteristics.

Conclusions: Women with BN present with an impairment only on higher CF demands, whereas their performance at lower-level CF tends to be more accurate. Additionally, CF is independent of clinical characteristics, thus supporting evidence that it may reflect a trait nature in BN.

神经性贪食症认知灵活性的理论驱动评估:初步研究。
背景:认知灵活性(CF)被定义为在不同概念或任务之间有效转换的能力。神经性贪食症(BN)患者CF的经验证据提供了相互矛盾的结论,归因于CF如何概念化和操作化。本研究的目的是利用包括任务转换、转换集和刺激-反应映射三种亚型的CF模型,将BN女性的CF表现与健康对照组进行比较。此外,研究CF亚型与BN临床特征之间的关系。方法:62名女性(28名BN患者,34名健康对照),平均年龄24.4岁,完成CF认知电池。性能通过响应时间和准确性来衡量。结果:BN组的反应时间仅在任务切换上差,但在刺激-反应映射上明显更准确。CF评分与BN临床特征无显著相关性。结论:BN女性仅在较高的CF要求下出现障碍,而在较低的CF要求下表现更准确。此外,CF独立于临床特征,因此支持证据表明它可能反映了BN的特征性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信