Current Practices and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in the Clinical Management of Eating Disorders: Insights From Clinicians and Community Participants.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jake Linardon, Claudia Liu, Mariel Messer, Zoe McClure, Cleo Anderson, Hannah K Jarman
{"title":"Current Practices and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in the Clinical Management of Eating Disorders: Insights From Clinicians and Community Participants.","authors":"Jake Linardon, Claudia Liu, Mariel Messer, Zoe McClure, Cleo Anderson, Hannah K Jarman","doi":"10.1002/eat.24385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) could revolutionize the delivery of mental health care, helping to streamline clinician workflows and assist with diagnostic and treatment decisions. Yet, before AI can be integrated into practice, it is necessary to understand perspectives of these tools to inform facilitators and barriers to their uptake. We gathered data on clinician and community participant perspectives of incorporating AI in the clinical management of eating disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey was distributed internationally to clinicians (n = 116) with experience in eating disorder treatment (psychologists, psychiatrists, etc.) and community participants (n = 155) who reported occurrence of eating disorder behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>59% of clinicians reported use of AI systems (most commonly ChatGPT) for professional reasons, compared to 18% of community participants using them for help-related purposes. While more than half of clinicians (58%) and community participants (53%) were open for AI to help support them, fewer were enthusiastic about their integration (40% and 27%, respectively) and believed that they would significantly improve client outcomes (28% and 13%, respectively). Nine in 10 agreed that AI may be improperly used if individuals are not adequately trained, and could pose new data privacy and security concerns. Most agreed that AI will be convenient, beneficial for administrative tasks, and an avenue for continuous support, but will never outperform human clinicians on relational skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While many clinicians and community participants are open to the use of AI in eating disorder treatment and recognize its possible wide-ranging benefits, most remain cautious and uncertain about its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) could revolutionize the delivery of mental health care, helping to streamline clinician workflows and assist with diagnostic and treatment decisions. Yet, before AI can be integrated into practice, it is necessary to understand perspectives of these tools to inform facilitators and barriers to their uptake. We gathered data on clinician and community participant perspectives of incorporating AI in the clinical management of eating disorders.

Method: A survey was distributed internationally to clinicians (n = 116) with experience in eating disorder treatment (psychologists, psychiatrists, etc.) and community participants (n = 155) who reported occurrence of eating disorder behaviors.

Results: 59% of clinicians reported use of AI systems (most commonly ChatGPT) for professional reasons, compared to 18% of community participants using them for help-related purposes. While more than half of clinicians (58%) and community participants (53%) were open for AI to help support them, fewer were enthusiastic about their integration (40% and 27%, respectively) and believed that they would significantly improve client outcomes (28% and 13%, respectively). Nine in 10 agreed that AI may be improperly used if individuals are not adequately trained, and could pose new data privacy and security concerns. Most agreed that AI will be convenient, beneficial for administrative tasks, and an avenue for continuous support, but will never outperform human clinicians on relational skills.

Conclusion: While many clinicians and community participants are open to the use of AI in eating disorder treatment and recognize its possible wide-ranging benefits, most remain cautious and uncertain about its implementation.

人工智能在饮食失调临床管理中的当前实践和前景:来自临床医生和社区参与者的见解。
目的:人工智能(AI)可以彻底改变精神卫生保健的提供方式,帮助简化临床医生的工作流程,并协助诊断和治疗决策。然而,在将人工智能整合到实践中之前,有必要了解这些工具的观点,以告知促进者和采用它们的障碍。我们收集了临床医生和社区参与者对将人工智能纳入饮食失调临床管理的观点的数据。方法:采用问卷调查的方式,在全球范围内对有进食障碍治疗经验的临床医生(n = 116)(心理学家、精神科医生等)和报告发生进食障碍行为的社区参与者(n = 155)进行调查。结果:59%的临床医生报告出于专业原因使用人工智能系统(最常见的是ChatGPT),相比之下,18%的社区参与者将其用于与帮助相关的目的。虽然超过一半的临床医生(58%)和社区参与者(53%)对人工智能的帮助持开放态度,但很少有人对人工智能的整合充满热情(分别为40%和27%),并相信它们会显著改善客户的结果(分别为28%和13%)。十分之九的人认为,如果个人没有得到充分的培训,人工智能可能会被不当使用,并可能带来新的数据隐私和安全问题。大多数人认为,人工智能将方便,有利于管理任务,并提供持续的支持,但在关系技能方面永远不会超过人类临床医生。结论:虽然许多临床医生和社区参与者对在饮食失调治疗中使用人工智能持开放态度,并认识到其可能带来的广泛益处,但大多数人对其实施仍持谨慎态度和不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信