Victor Pozzo, Marion Goutard, Yohann Dabi, Golda Romano, Marc-David Benjoar, Mikhael Benjoar, Ilyes Hadji, Zhi Yang Ng, Alexandre G Lellouch, Laurent A Lantieri
{"title":"Predictive Factors of a Dominant Superficial Venous Drainage System in DIEP Flap Surgery With Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography.","authors":"Victor Pozzo, Marion Goutard, Yohann Dabi, Golda Romano, Marc-David Benjoar, Mikhael Benjoar, Ilyes Hadji, Zhi Yang Ng, Alexandre G Lellouch, Laurent A Lantieri","doi":"10.1002/micr.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous congestion due to superficial venous system dominance (SVD) in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery occurs in approximately 2% of cases, with attendant sequelae and increased cost to healthcare systems. This study aimed to describe the predictive factors for SVD in DIEP flap breast reconstruction based on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women who required takebacks for additional venous anastomosis to the cephalic vein because of SVD after DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2022 were included. Complication-free DIEP breast reconstruction patients were then randomly selected based on a 1:2 enrollment ratio to form a control group. A retrospective analysis of pre-operative CTAs was performed for both groups to compare the size and location of the perforators, diameter of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV), diameter of the deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV), and flap thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four women were identified in the SVD group; however, only 18 were included in the final analysis. CTA analysis suggested that the ratio between SIEV and DIEV (SIEV/DIEV) diameters was significantly higher in the SVD group than in the controls (0.98 vs. 0.83; p = 0.043). The mean flap thickness was also significantly lower in the SVD group than in the controls (29.4 vs. 36.3 mm; p < 0.001). Perforator characteristics and the SIEV diameter did not differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SIEV/DIEV diameter ratio on preoperative CTA can be used to predict whether the DIEP flap has SVD. This may then be used to anticipate whether additional venous anastomosis is required to reduce postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 1","pages":"e70008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Venous congestion due to superficial venous system dominance (SVD) in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery occurs in approximately 2% of cases, with attendant sequelae and increased cost to healthcare systems. This study aimed to describe the predictive factors for SVD in DIEP flap breast reconstruction based on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings.
Methods: All women who required takebacks for additional venous anastomosis to the cephalic vein because of SVD after DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2022 were included. Complication-free DIEP breast reconstruction patients were then randomly selected based on a 1:2 enrollment ratio to form a control group. A retrospective analysis of pre-operative CTAs was performed for both groups to compare the size and location of the perforators, diameter of the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV), diameter of the deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV), and flap thickness.
Results: Twenty-four women were identified in the SVD group; however, only 18 were included in the final analysis. CTA analysis suggested that the ratio between SIEV and DIEV (SIEV/DIEV) diameters was significantly higher in the SVD group than in the controls (0.98 vs. 0.83; p = 0.043). The mean flap thickness was also significantly lower in the SVD group than in the controls (29.4 vs. 36.3 mm; p < 0.001). Perforator characteristics and the SIEV diameter did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions: The SIEV/DIEV diameter ratio on preoperative CTA can be used to predict whether the DIEP flap has SVD. This may then be used to anticipate whether additional venous anastomosis is required to reduce postoperative complications.
背景:大约2%的上腹部深下穿支(DIEP)皮瓣手术中由于浅静脉系统优势(SVD)引起的静脉充血,伴随着后遗症和医疗保健系统成本的增加。本研究旨在描述基于术前计算机断层血管造影(CTA)结果的DIEP皮瓣乳房重建中SVD的预测因素。方法:纳入2015年至2022年期间所有在DIEP皮瓣乳房重建术后因SVD而需要退回进行额外静脉吻合术的女性。然后按照1:2的入组比例随机选择无并发症的DIEP乳房重建术患者作为对照组。回顾性分析两组术前cta数据,比较穿支的大小和位置、腹壁下浅静脉(SIEV)直径、腹壁下深静脉(DIEV)直径和皮瓣厚度。结果:SVD组24例;然而,只有18个被纳入最终分析。CTA分析显示,SVD组SIEV与DIEV直径之比(SIEV/DIEV)显著高于对照组(0.98 vs. 0.83;p = 0.043)。SVD组皮瓣的平均厚度也明显低于对照组(29.4 vs. 36.3 mm;结论:术前CTA上SIEV/DIEV直径比值可用于预测DIEP皮瓣是否存在SVD。这可以用来预测是否需要额外的静脉吻合以减少术后并发症。
期刊介绍:
Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.