YouTube Videos of Pacemaker Implantation: An Assessment of Information Content and Quality.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pok-Tin Tang, C Fielder Camm, Saffron Rajappan, Richard D Sale, Kim Rajappan
{"title":"YouTube Videos of Pacemaker Implantation: An Assessment of Information Content and Quality.","authors":"Pok-Tin Tang, C Fielder Camm, Saffron Rajappan, Richard D Sale, Kim Rajappan","doi":"10.1111/jce.16540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a commonly performed procedure. Patients increasingly use the Internet for information on medical interventions. We aimed to assess the quality of videos discussing PPM implantation on YouTube for patient consumption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>YouTube was searched on October 19, 2022, for \"PPM implantation\" and \"Pacemaker.\" The first 100 results from each search were screened: all English language videos containing predominant discussion of transvenous PPMs were included; YouTube shorts and advertisements were excluded. Two authors independently assessed videos for information content based on criteria generated using established patient resources supplemented by expert consensus. Video reliability and quality were assessed using a novel scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three videos with a cumulative total of 5 864 488 views were included. No video contained all essential information criteria. The average number of essential criteria covered was 8/32 (standard deviation 4.8). Peri-operative management was, particularly, poorly covered: no item relating to preoperative management or postoperative care was covered by more than 40% of videos. None of the videos fulfilled all quality criteria, with a median score of 7.5/13 (interquartile range 6.5-8). Videos performed, particularly, poorly on providing balanced messages, creator disclosures, attribution of source content, and indicating when videos were made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube videos of PPM implantation do not contain sufficient information to allow patients to gain an appropriate understanding of this procedure. Furthermore, the information presented is of insufficient quality to support decision-making. There is a need for a professionally regulated, comprehensive audiovisual patient resource on PPM implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a commonly performed procedure. Patients increasingly use the Internet for information on medical interventions. We aimed to assess the quality of videos discussing PPM implantation on YouTube for patient consumption.

Methods: YouTube was searched on October 19, 2022, for "PPM implantation" and "Pacemaker." The first 100 results from each search were screened: all English language videos containing predominant discussion of transvenous PPMs were included; YouTube shorts and advertisements were excluded. Two authors independently assessed videos for information content based on criteria generated using established patient resources supplemented by expert consensus. Video reliability and quality were assessed using a novel scoring system.

Results: Thirty-three videos with a cumulative total of 5 864 488 views were included. No video contained all essential information criteria. The average number of essential criteria covered was 8/32 (standard deviation 4.8). Peri-operative management was, particularly, poorly covered: no item relating to preoperative management or postoperative care was covered by more than 40% of videos. None of the videos fulfilled all quality criteria, with a median score of 7.5/13 (interquartile range 6.5-8). Videos performed, particularly, poorly on providing balanced messages, creator disclosures, attribution of source content, and indicating when videos were made.

Conclusion: YouTube videos of PPM implantation do not contain sufficient information to allow patients to gain an appropriate understanding of this procedure. Furthermore, the information presented is of insufficient quality to support decision-making. There is a need for a professionally regulated, comprehensive audiovisual patient resource on PPM implantation.

YouTube关于心脏起搏器植入的视频:信息内容和质量的评估。
背景:永久起搏器(PPM)植入是一种常见的手术。患者越来越多地使用互联网获取有关医疗干预措施的信息。我们的目的是评估YouTube上讨论PPM植入的视频的质量,以供患者使用。方法:于2022年10月19日在YouTube上搜索“PPM植入”和“Pacemaker”。筛选每个搜索的前100个结果:包括所有主要讨论经静脉PPMs的英语视频;YouTube短片和广告被排除在外。两位作者独立评估视频的信息内容,基于使用已建立的患者资源并辅以专家共识的标准。视频的可靠性和质量用一种新颖的评分系统进行评估。结果:共纳入视频33段,累计浏览量为5 864 488次。没有视频包含所有必要的信息标准。涵盖的基本标准的平均数目为8/32(标准差为4.8)。围手术期管理的报道尤其少:与术前管理或术后护理相关的项目在40%以上的视频中都没有涉及。没有一个视频达到所有的质量标准,中位数得分为7.5/13(四分位数范围为6.5-8)。视频在提供平衡的信息、创作者披露、源内容的归属以及显示视频制作时间方面表现得尤其糟糕。结论:YouTube上关于PPM植入术的视频没有提供足够的信息,无法让患者对该手术有适当的了解。此外,所提供的信息质量不足,无法支持决策。需要一个专业规范的,全面的视听患者资源的PPM植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信