Expert perspectives on tuberculosis screening procedures for migrants.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240347
Marina Pinheiro, David N Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte
{"title":"Expert perspectives on tuberculosis screening procedures for migrants.","authors":"Marina Pinheiro, David N Moreira, Ana Aguiar, Raquel Duarte","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the perspectives of tuberculosis experts from different countries regarding national screening procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative descriptive study. Data were collected by using electronic, anonymized surveys with experts in tuberculosis in seven different countries within two World Health Organization regions (Europe and Africa). Thematic analysis was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey results indicate that there are varied perceptions of and experiences with national guidelines on screening for and treatment of tuberculosis (especially in the population tested), the appropriate timing of screening, types of tests, best practices, barriers, and limitations of the screening. The participants highlighted the importance of integrating health care services into the community to achieve people-centered health care. The study also sheds light on the importance of involving trained nurses and social workers in the screening process and of networks to ensure continuity of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall perceptions of the respondents underscore the importance of standardized screening guidelines. The ongoing collaboration between public health services, the private sector, and the community is essential to reduce tuberculosis transmission, as well as to provide substantial public health and economic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"50 6","pages":"e20240347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the perspectives of tuberculosis experts from different countries regarding national screening procedures.

Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive study. Data were collected by using electronic, anonymized surveys with experts in tuberculosis in seven different countries within two World Health Organization regions (Europe and Africa). Thematic analysis was employed.

Results: The survey results indicate that there are varied perceptions of and experiences with national guidelines on screening for and treatment of tuberculosis (especially in the population tested), the appropriate timing of screening, types of tests, best practices, barriers, and limitations of the screening. The participants highlighted the importance of integrating health care services into the community to achieve people-centered health care. The study also sheds light on the importance of involving trained nurses and social workers in the screening process and of networks to ensure continuity of care.

Conclusions: The overall perceptions of the respondents underscore the importance of standardized screening guidelines. The ongoing collaboration between public health services, the private sector, and the community is essential to reduce tuberculosis transmission, as well as to provide substantial public health and economic benefits.

专家对移民结核病筛查程序的看法。
目的:评价不同国家结核病专家对国家筛查程序的看法。方法:定性描述性研究。数据是通过对世界卫生组织两个区域(欧洲和非洲)七个不同国家的结核病专家进行电子匿名调查收集的。采用专题分析。结果:调查结果表明,对于结核病筛查和治疗的国家准则(特别是在接受检测的人群中)、筛查的适当时机、检测类型、最佳做法、筛查的障碍和限制,人们的看法和经验各不相同。与会者强调了将卫生保健服务纳入社区以实现以人为本的卫生保健的重要性。该研究还阐明了让训练有素的护士和社会工作者参与筛查过程以及建立网络以确保护理连续性的重要性。结论:受访者的总体看法强调了标准化筛查指南的重要性。公共卫生服务、私营部门和社区之间的持续合作对于减少结核病的传播以及提供巨大的公共卫生和经济利益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信