The impact of bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent nano-crush technique: the insight from the multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH V study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Ahmet Güner, Elnur Alizade, İlyas Çetin, Ebru Serin, Abdullah Doğan, Kaan Gökçe, Berkay Serter, Koray Çiloğlu, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Hande Uysal, Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Cemalettin Akman, Aybüke Şimşek, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Kudret Keskin, Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Merve Aydin, Emre Aydin, Büşra Çörekçioğlu, Mehmet Köseoğlu, Fatih Uzun
{"title":"The impact of bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent nano-crush technique: the insight from the multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH V study.","authors":"Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Ahmet Güner, Elnur Alizade, İlyas Çetin, Ebru Serin, Abdullah Doğan, Kaan Gökçe, Berkay Serter, Koray Çiloğlu, İbrahim Faruk Aktürk, Hande Uysal, Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Cemalettin Akman, Aybüke Şimşek, Fatih Furkan Bedir, Veysel Ozan Tanik, Kudret Keskin, Hamdi Püşüroğlu, Merve Aydin, Emre Aydin, Büşra Çörekçioğlu, Mehmet Köseoğlu, Fatih Uzun","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This multicenter study aimed to retrospectively assess the relationship between bifurcation angle (BA) and major cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients undergoing nano-crush technique (NCT) for complex bifurcation lesions (CBLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 122 consecutive patients [male: 85 (69.6%), mean age: 61.53 ± 9.03 years] who underwent NCT between January 2019 and January 2024 were included. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint (MACE) including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Patients were classified into two groups: MACE-positive and MACE-negative patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the study population, 22 patients (18%) had at least one MACE. The BA (46.89 ± 14.65° vs. 65.23 ± 10.40°, P = 0.001) was notably lower in the MACE-positive group than the MACE-negative group. In multivariable regression analysis, decreased BA was identified as one of the independent predictors of MACE (odds ratio = 0.908; 95% confidence interval: 0.852-0.969; P < 0.001). We divided the study cohort into two subgroups based on historical narrow and wide BAs (<70 vs. ≥70°). The incidence of MACE (25.3 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.008), clinically driven TLR (22.7 vs. 4.3%, P = 0.009), and TVMI (18.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.001) were notably higher in the BA <70° group than in the BA ≥70° group. Kaplan-Meier analysis also revealed that MACE-free survival was significantly lower in the BA <70° group than in the BA ≥70° group under mid-term follow-up (log-rank P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This observational multicenter study showed that the BA significantly affects mid-term outcomes in patients who underwent NCT. In addition, our findings suggest that NCT may not be a viable option in patients with narrow-angle (<70°) CBLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This multicenter study aimed to retrospectively assess the relationship between bifurcation angle (BA) and major cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients undergoing nano-crush technique (NCT) for complex bifurcation lesions (CBLs).

Methods: A total of 122 consecutive patients [male: 85 (69.6%), mean age: 61.53 ± 9.03 years] who underwent NCT between January 2019 and January 2024 were included. The primary endpoint was a combined endpoint (MACE) including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Patients were classified into two groups: MACE-positive and MACE-negative patients.

Results: Among the study population, 22 patients (18%) had at least one MACE. The BA (46.89 ± 14.65° vs. 65.23 ± 10.40°, P = 0.001) was notably lower in the MACE-positive group than the MACE-negative group. In multivariable regression analysis, decreased BA was identified as one of the independent predictors of MACE (odds ratio = 0.908; 95% confidence interval: 0.852-0.969; P < 0.001). We divided the study cohort into two subgroups based on historical narrow and wide BAs (<70 vs. ≥70°). The incidence of MACE (25.3 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.008), clinically driven TLR (22.7 vs. 4.3%, P = 0.009), and TVMI (18.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.001) were notably higher in the BA <70° group than in the BA ≥70° group. Kaplan-Meier analysis also revealed that MACE-free survival was significantly lower in the BA <70° group than in the BA ≥70° group under mid-term follow-up (log-rank P = 0.009).

Conclusion: This observational multicenter study showed that the BA significantly affects mid-term outcomes in patients who underwent NCT. In addition, our findings suggest that NCT may not be a viable option in patients with narrow-angle (<70°) CBLs.

分叉角度对接受纳米粉碎技术患者临床结果的影响:来自多中心EVOLUTE-CRUSH V研究的见解
背景:本多中心研究旨在回顾性评估接受纳米粉碎技术(NCT)治疗复杂分叉病变(CBLs)患者的分叉角(BA)与主要心血管事件(mace)之间的关系。方法:纳入2019年1月至2024年1月期间连续行NCT的122例患者[男性:85例(69.6%),平均年龄:61.53±9.03岁]。主要终点是一个联合终点(MACE),包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TVMI)或临床驱动靶病变血运重建术(TLR)。患者分为mace阳性和mace阴性两组。结果:在研究人群中,22例(18%)患者至少有一次MACE。mace阳性组BA(46.89±14.65°∶65.23±10.40°,P = 0.001)明显低于mace阴性组。在多变量回归分析中,BA下降被确定为MACE的独立预测因子之一(优势比= 0.908;95%置信区间:0.852-0.969;P < 0.001)。我们根据历史上狭窄的BA和广泛的BA将研究队列分为两个亚组(结论:这项多中心观察性研究表明,BA显著影响NCT患者的中期预后。此外,我们的研究结果表明,NCT可能不是窄角度(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信