Evaluation of the influence of connection configuration on the implant-abutment interface vertical misfit of original milled titanium and laser-sintered cobalt-chromium abutments.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pedro Diaz, Beatriz Vizoso, Carlos Lopez-Suarez, Esther Gonzalo, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Maria J Suarez
{"title":"Evaluation of the influence of connection configuration on the implant-abutment interface vertical misfit of original milled titanium and laser-sintered cobalt-chromium abutments.","authors":"Pedro Diaz, Beatriz Vizoso, Carlos Lopez-Suarez, Esther Gonzalo, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Maria J Suarez","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the vertical misfit at the implant-abutment interface in external and internal connections across various implant brands, comparing original milled titanium abutments with laser-sintered cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 160 implants from four different brands were utilized, with 80 featuring external connections (EC) and 80 internal connections (IC). Original milled titanium abutments (n = 160) and Co-Cr laser-sintered abutments (n = 160) were randomly attached to each connection type, following the manufacturer's recommended torque. After undergoing thermal cycling, the vertical misfit was measured using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original milled titanium abutments exhibited the lowest misfit values. Significant differences were identified between both abutment types for EC (d = 109.578 μm; p = 0.0001) and IC (d = 44.317 μm; p = 0.002). The EC with laser-sintered abutments demonstrated the highest marginal misfit values, with an average of nearly 30 μm, while a misfit value of 11.382 μm was achieved in the IC. Differences were observed among the brands for milled abutments in both EC and IC. Similarly, variations were also noted for the laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments in EC and IC configurations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vertical misfit of the original milled titanium abutments in all groups was within the clinically acceptable range for IC. The connection type significantly impacted the vertical misfit in laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments. Differences among the implant systems were observed for both connection types and abutment types evaluated.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Using original milled titanium abutments, particularly in internal connection systems, can lead to better fit and stability at the implant-abutment interface, potentially reducing the risk of mechanical complications and improving long-term implant success.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the vertical misfit at the implant-abutment interface in external and internal connections across various implant brands, comparing original milled titanium abutments with laser-sintered cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) abutments.

Materials and methods: A total of 160 implants from four different brands were utilized, with 80 featuring external connections (EC) and 80 internal connections (IC). Original milled titanium abutments (n = 160) and Co-Cr laser-sintered abutments (n = 160) were randomly attached to each connection type, following the manufacturer's recommended torque. After undergoing thermal cycling, the vertical misfit was measured using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.

Results: The original milled titanium abutments exhibited the lowest misfit values. Significant differences were identified between both abutment types for EC (d = 109.578 μm; p = 0.0001) and IC (d = 44.317 μm; p = 0.002). The EC with laser-sintered abutments demonstrated the highest marginal misfit values, with an average of nearly 30 μm, while a misfit value of 11.382 μm was achieved in the IC. Differences were observed among the brands for milled abutments in both EC and IC. Similarly, variations were also noted for the laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments in EC and IC configurations.

Conclusions: The vertical misfit of the original milled titanium abutments in all groups was within the clinically acceptable range for IC. The connection type significantly impacted the vertical misfit in laser-sintered Co-Cr abutments. Differences among the implant systems were observed for both connection types and abutment types evaluated.

Clinical relevance: Using original milled titanium abutments, particularly in internal connection systems, can lead to better fit and stability at the implant-abutment interface, potentially reducing the risk of mechanical complications and improving long-term implant success.

连接形态对原始铣削钛基牙与激光烧结钴铬基牙种植-基牙界面垂直错位影响的评价。
目的:本研究旨在评估种植体-基台界面在不同种植体品牌的外部和内部连接中的垂直错位,比较原始研磨钛基台和激光烧结钴铬基台。材料和方法:共使用四个不同品牌的160个种植体,其中80个为外连接体(EC), 80个为内连接体(IC)。原始铣削钛基台(n = 160)和Co-Cr激光烧结基台(n = 160)按照制造商推荐的扭矩随机连接到每种连接类型。经过热循环后,用扫描电子显微镜测量垂直失配。采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。显著性水平设为α = 0.05。结果:原磨钛基台失配值最低。两种基台在EC (d = 109.578 μm;p = 0.0001)和IC (d = 44.317 μm;p = 0.002)。具有激光烧结基台的EC表现出最高的边际失配值,平均接近30 μm,而IC的失配值为11.382 μm。在EC和IC中,铣磨基台的品牌之间存在差异。同样,在EC和IC配置中,激光烧结Co-Cr基台也存在差异。结论:各组原磨钛基牙的垂直错位均在IC临床可接受范围内,连接方式对激光烧结Co-Cr基牙的垂直错位有显著影响。观察不同种植体系统在连接类型和基台类型上的差异。临床意义:使用原始的磨钛基台,特别是在内部连接系统中,可以更好地配合和稳定种植体-基台界面,潜在地降低机械并发症的风险,提高长期种植成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信