Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Lung Tumors: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1159/000543576
Konstantinos Christofidis, Alexandros Pergaris, Maria Kalfa, Eirini Klapsinou, Vasiliki Kyriakidou, Zoi Chodrodimou, Kyriaki Savvidou, Maria Terzi, Chrysa Stamou, Dimitrios Mallios, Kosmas Iliadis, Charitini Salla, Panagiota Mikou
{"title":"Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Lung Tumors: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.","authors":"Konstantinos Christofidis, Alexandros Pergaris, Maria Kalfa, Eirini Klapsinou, Vasiliki Kyriakidou, Zoi Chodrodimou, Kyriaki Savvidou, Maria Terzi, Chrysa Stamou, Dimitrios Mallios, Kosmas Iliadis, Charitini Salla, Panagiota Mikou","doi":"10.1159/000543576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer remains a major health challenge, and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has emerged as a valuable tool in lung cancer diagnosis. This study aims to assess the performance of ROSE in the intraoperative diagnosis of lung cancer and its correlation with the histological findings of frozen sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 414 cases of intraoperative ROSE performed during lung surgeries between 2017 and 2022. Cytological findings were classified according to the World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology and compared with the subsequent histological diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROSE demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy of 92.2%. The risk of malignancy varied across diagnostic categories, highlighting the value of ROSE in risk stratification. Only 12% of cases with a ROSE diagnosis of malignancy or suspicion of malignancy were discordant with the final histological diagnosis and only as to the specific tumor type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid on-site evaluation is a reliable technique for lung cancer diagnosis, not only during EBUS or CT guided FNA but also in the setting of lung surgery, offering high accuracy and risk stratification. It contributes to improved patient management by optimizing procedures, reducing complications, and enhancing specimen quality for further analyses. ROSE is a valuable asset in the modern era of personalized medicine, facilitating tailored treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a major health challenge, and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has emerged as a valuable tool in lung cancer diagnosis. This study aims to assess the performance of ROSE in the intraoperative diagnosis of lung cancer and its correlation with the histological findings of frozen sections.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 414 cases of intraoperative ROSE performed during lung surgeries between 2017 and 2022. Cytological findings were classified according to the World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology and compared with the subsequent histological diagnoses.

Results: ROSE demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy of 92.2%. The risk of malignancy varied across diagnostic categories, highlighting the value of ROSE in risk stratification. Only 12% of cases with a ROSE diagnosis of malignancy or suspicion of malignancy were discordant with the final histological diagnosis and only as to the specific tumor type.

Conclusions: Rapid on-site evaluation is a reliable technique for lung cancer diagnosis, not only during EBUS or CT guided FNA but also in the setting of lung surgery, offering high accuracy and risk stratification. It contributes to improved patient management by optimizing procedures, reducing complications, and enhancing specimen quality for further analyses. ROSE is a valuable asset in the modern era of personalized medicine, facilitating tailored treatment approaches.

术中肺肿瘤快速现场评估:诊断准确性研究。
肺癌仍然是一个主要的健康挑战,准确的诊断是有效治疗的关键。快速现场评价(ROSE)已成为肺癌诊断的一种有价值的工具。本研究旨在评估ROSE在肺癌术中诊断中的表现及其与冷冻切片组织学表现的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2017 - 2022年肺外科手术中414例术中ROSE的临床资料。细胞学结果根据世界卫生组织肺细胞病理学报告系统进行分类,并与随后的组织学诊断进行比较。结果:ROSE诊断准确率高达92.2%。恶性肿瘤的风险因诊断类别而异,突出了ROSE在风险分层中的价值。只有12%的ROSE诊断为恶性或怀疑恶性的病例与最终的组织学诊断不一致,仅针对特定的肿瘤类型。结论:快速现场评估是一种可靠的肺癌诊断技术,不仅适用于EBUS或CT引导下的FNA,也适用于肺外科手术,具有较高的准确性和风险分层。它通过优化程序、减少并发症和提高标本质量以供进一步分析,有助于改善患者管理。在个性化医疗的现代时代,ROSE是一项宝贵的资产,促进了量身定制的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信