The Use of Knives With Versus Without Integrated Water-jet Function During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients With Achalasia: A Meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Abdul-Rahman F Diab, Joseph A Sujka, Muhammad Nashit, Ameen Abdel-Khalek, Sukriti Seth, Salvatore Docimo, Christopher G DuCoin
{"title":"The Use of Knives With Versus Without Integrated Water-jet Function During Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Patients With Achalasia: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdul-Rahman F Diab, Joseph A Sujka, Muhammad Nashit, Ameen Abdel-Khalek, Sukriti Seth, Salvatore Docimo, Christopher G DuCoin","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a well-established endoscopic treatment for achalasia, utilizing an endoscopic knife for dissection. Recently, new knives with an integrated water-jet (WJ) function have been introduced. This study aims to compare the technical, perioperative, and late postoperative outcomes between WJ knives and conventional (C) knives, which lack the WJ function, through a pairwise meta-analysis of published comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies directly comparing knives with versus without a WJ function in POEM for achalasia. A random-effects model was employed, using odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data as effect size metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of WJ knives demonstrated statistically significant reductions in the mean number of intraoperative instrument exchanges, mean intraoperative use of coagulation forceps, and operative times compared to the use of C knives. There were no significant differences in terms of the incidence of adverse events, subcutaneous emphysema, or mean hospital length of stay (LOS). Clinical success, defined as a postoperative Eckardt score <3, mean postoperative Eckardt scores, and the incidence of GERD requiring proton pump inhibitors (PPI) also showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of water-jet (WJ) knives demonstrates comparable efficacy to conventional (C) knives, with superior efficiency reflected in reduced operative time and fewer intraoperative instrument exchanges. In addition, in terms of safety, the lower use of coagulation forceps with WJ knives suggests reduced intraoperative bleeding. However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of stay (LOS) and adverse events, despite a trend toward reduction. A larger number of studies with greater sample sizes is required to better assess potential differences in safety between the use of WJ and C knives.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a well-established endoscopic treatment for achalasia, utilizing an endoscopic knife for dissection. Recently, new knives with an integrated water-jet (WJ) function have been introduced. This study aims to compare the technical, perioperative, and late postoperative outcomes between WJ knives and conventional (C) knives, which lack the WJ function, through a pairwise meta-analysis of published comparative studies.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies directly comparing knives with versus without a WJ function in POEM for achalasia. A random-effects model was employed, using odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data as effect size metrics.

Results: The use of WJ knives demonstrated statistically significant reductions in the mean number of intraoperative instrument exchanges, mean intraoperative use of coagulation forceps, and operative times compared to the use of C knives. There were no significant differences in terms of the incidence of adverse events, subcutaneous emphysema, or mean hospital length of stay (LOS). Clinical success, defined as a postoperative Eckardt score <3, mean postoperative Eckardt scores, and the incidence of GERD requiring proton pump inhibitors (PPI) also showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: The use of water-jet (WJ) knives demonstrates comparable efficacy to conventional (C) knives, with superior efficiency reflected in reduced operative time and fewer intraoperative instrument exchanges. In addition, in terms of safety, the lower use of coagulation forceps with WJ knives suggests reduced intraoperative bleeding. However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of stay (LOS) and adverse events, despite a trend toward reduction. A larger number of studies with greater sample sizes is required to better assess potential differences in safety between the use of WJ and C knives.

口腔内窥镜肌切开术治疗失弛缓症患者时使用带喷水功能的刀与不带喷水功能的刀:一项 Meta 分析。
背景:经口内窥镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一种完善的贲门失弛缓症的内镜治疗方法,利用内窥镜刀进行解剖。最近,新刀与集成水射流(WJ)功能已经推出。本研究旨在通过对已发表的比较研究的两两荟萃分析,比较WJ刀与缺乏WJ功能的传统(C)刀的技术、围手术期和术后后期结果。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南进行了系统的文献综述,以确定直接比较POEM治疗贲门失弛缓症的刀是否具有WJ功能的研究。采用随机效应模型,使用二分数据的优势比和连续数据的平均差异作为效应大小指标。结果:与使用C刀相比,使用WJ刀在术中器械平均更换次数、术中凝血钳平均使用次数和手术次数方面具有统计学意义。在不良事件发生率、皮下肺气肿或平均住院时间(LOS)方面,两组无显著差异。结论:水射流刀(water-jet, WJ)与常规(C)刀的疗效相当,其优势体现在更短的手术时间和更少的术中器械更换。此外,在安全性方面,凝血钳与WJ刀的使用率较低,提示术中出血减少。然而,尽管有减少的趋势,但在住院时间(LOS)和不良事件方面,两组之间没有观察到显著差异。为了更好地评估使用WJ刀和C刀在安全性上的潜在差异,需要进行更多的样本量更大的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信