Understanding HCBS utilization: The role of disability onset age and length of disability.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
G Chiri, J N Howard, L Palmer, K Robinson, S Rafiuddin
{"title":"Understanding HCBS utilization: The role of disability onset age and length of disability.","authors":"G Chiri, J N Howard, L Palmer, K Robinson, S Rafiuddin","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Younger adults aging with and older adults aging into disability often need support to remain in their homes and communities. However, researchers and policymakers lack sufficient understanding of their differing needs for home and community-based services (HCBS), largely due to limitations in existing data.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study addresses this gap by exploring select HCBS utilization among adults with disability onset before age 60 and those with onset after age 60, focusing on how aging and disability intersect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from multiple waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the HCBS HRS module and the Health Care Mail Survey. Using these data, we identified individuals by their disability onset (before and after age 60) and measured the duration of their disability. We then examined the use of select HCBS and its association with the onset and duration of disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate regression analysis found no significant differences in service utilization based on the timing of disability onset. Instead, a longer disability duration was associated with increased odds of utilizing HCBS, regardless of when the disability began.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the population continues to age, more individuals will live with disabilities, including both those who acquire them earlier in life and older adults who develop them in later years. This analysis emphasizes the critical role of disability duration in understanding service needs and resource allocation. By combining perspectives from aging and disability research, this study underscores the need for integrated policies and programs that address shared challenges. Such an approach can bridge existing gaps, leading to better outcomes for all individuals living with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101771"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Younger adults aging with and older adults aging into disability often need support to remain in their homes and communities. However, researchers and policymakers lack sufficient understanding of their differing needs for home and community-based services (HCBS), largely due to limitations in existing data.

Objectives: This study addresses this gap by exploring select HCBS utilization among adults with disability onset before age 60 and those with onset after age 60, focusing on how aging and disability intersect.

Methods: We used data from multiple waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the HCBS HRS module and the Health Care Mail Survey. Using these data, we identified individuals by their disability onset (before and after age 60) and measured the duration of their disability. We then examined the use of select HCBS and its association with the onset and duration of disability.

Results: Multivariate regression analysis found no significant differences in service utilization based on the timing of disability onset. Instead, a longer disability duration was associated with increased odds of utilizing HCBS, regardless of when the disability began.

Conclusion: As the population continues to age, more individuals will live with disabilities, including both those who acquire them earlier in life and older adults who develop them in later years. This analysis emphasizes the critical role of disability duration in understanding service needs and resource allocation. By combining perspectives from aging and disability research, this study underscores the need for integrated policies and programs that address shared challenges. Such an approach can bridge existing gaps, leading to better outcomes for all individuals living with disabilities.

了解HCBS的使用:残疾发病年龄和残疾时间长短的作用。
背景:随着年龄增长而变老的年轻人和变老为残疾的老年人往往需要支持才能留在家中和社区。然而,由于现有数据的限制,研究人员和决策者对他们对家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的不同需求缺乏足够的了解。目的:本研究通过探索60岁之前和60岁之后发病的成人中HCBS的使用情况,重点研究老龄化和残疾之间的关系,从而解决这一差距。方法:我们使用来自健康与退休研究(HRS)、HCBS HRS模块和卫生保健邮件调查的多波数据。使用这些数据,我们根据他们的残疾发病(60岁之前和60岁之后)来识别个体,并测量他们残疾的持续时间。然后,我们检查了选定HCBS的使用及其与残疾发病和持续时间的关系。结果:多因素回归分析发现,残疾发病时间对服务利用率的影响无显著性差异。相反,无论何时开始残疾,较长的残疾持续时间与使用HCBS的几率增加有关。结论:随着人口持续老龄化,越来越多的人将患有残疾,包括那些在生命早期获得残疾的人和在晚年发展残疾的老年人。这一分析强调了残疾持续时间在理解服务需求和资源分配方面的关键作用。通过结合老龄化和残疾研究的观点,本研究强调了制定综合政策和项目以应对共同挑战的必要性。这种方法可以弥合现有差距,为所有残疾人带来更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信