Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Key Variables.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007093
Alexander D Stoker, Andrew W Gorlin, David M Rosenfeld, Michelle C Nguyen, Amit K Mathur, Skye A Buckner-Petty, Blanca C Lizaola-Mayo, Peter E Frasco
{"title":"Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Impact of Normothermic Machine Perfusion on Key Variables.","authors":"Alexander D Stoker, Andrew W Gorlin, David M Rosenfeld, Michelle C Nguyen, Amit K Mathur, Skye A Buckner-Petty, Blanca C Lizaola-Mayo, Peter E Frasco","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During orthotopic liver transplantation, allograft reperfusion is a dynamic point in the operation and often requires vasoactive medications and blood transfusions. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of liver allografts has emerged to increase the number of transplantable organs and may have utility during donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation in reducing transfusion burden and vasoactive medication requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study involving 226 DCD liver transplant recipients who received an allograft transported with NMP (DCD-NMP group) or with static cold storage (DCD-SCS group). Veno-venous bypass was not used in any patients. Infusion doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin as well as bolus doses of vasoactive medications during reperfusion were recorded. Blood component therapy was recorded according to phase of liver transplantation and during the first 24 hours postprocedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 recipients in the DCD-NMP group and 123 patients in the DCD-SCS group were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) incidence was reduced in the DCD-NMP group compared to the DCD-SCS group (10.7% [95% confidence interval, CI, 5.5%-18.3%] vs 42.3% [95% CI, 33.4%-51.5%]; P < .001). During the reperfusion period, patients in the DCD-SCS group required increased bolus doses of epinephrine and vasopressin compared to the DCD-NMP group (24.6 vs 7.5 µg; P < .001) and (5.4 vs 2.4 units; P < .001), respectively. The DCD-SCS group received a higher infusion dose of epinephrine during anhepatic phase, at reperfusion, and up to 90 minutes after reperfusion. In the postreperfusion period, there were significant increases in the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs; 5.3 vs 3.7 units; P = .006), fresh frozen plasma (FFP; 3.4 vs 1.9 units; P < .001), cryoprecipitate (2.7 vs 1.8 pooled units; P = .015) and platelets (0.9 vs 0.4 units; P = .008) in the DCD-SCS group compared to the DCD-NMP group. During the first 24 hours postprocedure, transfusion of RBCs, FFP, and cryoprecipitate in the DCD-SCS group was increased compared to the DCD-NMP group ([2.6 vs 1.7 units; P = .028], [1.6 vs 0.8 units; P < .001], [1.5 vs 0.9 pooled units; P = .031]) respectively. Administration of tranexamic acid was more frequent in the DCD-SCS group during the post-reperfusion period compared to the DCD-NMP group (13% [95% CI, 5.7%-17.4%] vs 3.9% [95% CI, 1.1%-9.6% 95%]; P = .018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In DCD liver transplantation, use of NMP was associated with reduced incidence of PRS and decreased vasopressor and inotrope requirements at the time of allograft reperfusion compared to using SCS. Additionally, NMP was associated with reduced transfusion of all blood product components as well as antifibrinolytic agent administration in the post-reperfusion period. Reduced transfusion burden in the DCD-NMP group also occurred during the first 24 hours posttransplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"687-696"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During orthotopic liver transplantation, allograft reperfusion is a dynamic point in the operation and often requires vasoactive medications and blood transfusions. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of liver allografts has emerged to increase the number of transplantable organs and may have utility during donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation in reducing transfusion burden and vasoactive medication requirements.

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study involving 226 DCD liver transplant recipients who received an allograft transported with NMP (DCD-NMP group) or with static cold storage (DCD-SCS group). Veno-venous bypass was not used in any patients. Infusion doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin as well as bolus doses of vasoactive medications during reperfusion were recorded. Blood component therapy was recorded according to phase of liver transplantation and during the first 24 hours postprocedure.

Results: A total of 103 recipients in the DCD-NMP group and 123 patients in the DCD-SCS group were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) incidence was reduced in the DCD-NMP group compared to the DCD-SCS group (10.7% [95% confidence interval, CI, 5.5%-18.3%] vs 42.3% [95% CI, 33.4%-51.5%]; P < .001). During the reperfusion period, patients in the DCD-SCS group required increased bolus doses of epinephrine and vasopressin compared to the DCD-NMP group (24.6 vs 7.5 µg; P < .001) and (5.4 vs 2.4 units; P < .001), respectively. The DCD-SCS group received a higher infusion dose of epinephrine during anhepatic phase, at reperfusion, and up to 90 minutes after reperfusion. In the postreperfusion period, there were significant increases in the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs; 5.3 vs 3.7 units; P = .006), fresh frozen plasma (FFP; 3.4 vs 1.9 units; P < .001), cryoprecipitate (2.7 vs 1.8 pooled units; P = .015) and platelets (0.9 vs 0.4 units; P = .008) in the DCD-SCS group compared to the DCD-NMP group. During the first 24 hours postprocedure, transfusion of RBCs, FFP, and cryoprecipitate in the DCD-SCS group was increased compared to the DCD-NMP group ([2.6 vs 1.7 units; P = .028], [1.6 vs 0.8 units; P < .001], [1.5 vs 0.9 pooled units; P = .031]) respectively. Administration of tranexamic acid was more frequent in the DCD-SCS group during the post-reperfusion period compared to the DCD-NMP group (13% [95% CI, 5.7%-17.4%] vs 3.9% [95% CI, 1.1%-9.6% 95%]; P = .018).

Conclusions: In DCD liver transplantation, use of NMP was associated with reduced incidence of PRS and decreased vasopressor and inotrope requirements at the time of allograft reperfusion compared to using SCS. Additionally, NMP was associated with reduced transfusion of all blood product components as well as antifibrinolytic agent administration in the post-reperfusion period. Reduced transfusion burden in the DCD-NMP group also occurred during the first 24 hours posttransplant.

循环死亡肝移植后捐献:恒温机灌注对关键变量的影响。
背景:在原位肝移植中,同种异体移植物再灌注是手术中的一个动态点,通常需要血管活性药物和输血。同种异体肝移植的正常机器灌注(NMP)已经出现,以增加可移植器官的数量,并可能在循环死亡(DCD)肝移植后的捐赠中减少输血负担和血管活性药物需求。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,涉及226例接受NMP运输的同种异体肝移植(DCD-NMP组)或静态冷藏(DCD- scs组)的DCD肝移植受者。所有患者均未使用静脉-静脉旁路。记录再灌注时去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素和加压素的输注剂量以及血管活性药物的大剂量。根据肝移植分期及术后24小时记录血液成分治疗情况。结果:共纳入103例DCD-NMP组患者和123例DCD-SCS组患者。与DCD-SCS组相比,DCD-NMP组的再灌注综合征(PRS)发生率降低(10.7%[95%可信区间,CI, 5.5%-18.3%] vs 42.3% [95% CI, 33.4%-51.5%];P < 0.001)。在再灌注期间,与DCD-NMP组相比,DCD-SCS组患者需要增加肾上腺素和加压素的大剂量(24.6 vs 7.5µg;P < 0.001)和(5.4 vs 2.4单位;P < 0.001)。DCD-SCS组在无肝期、再灌注时以及再灌注后90分钟内接受更高剂量的肾上腺素输注。在灌注后,红细胞(rbc)的输入显著增加;5.3 vs 3.7单位;P = 0.006),新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP;3.4 vs 1.9单位;P < .001),低温沉淀(2.7 vs 1.8混合单位;P = 0.015)和血小板(0.9 vs 0.4单位;P = 0.008),与cd - nmp组比较。术后24小时内,与DCD-NMP组相比,DCD-SCS组的红细胞、FFP和低温沉淀输注量增加([2.6 vs 1.7单位;P = 0.028], [1.6 vs 0.8单位;P < .001], [1.5 vs 0.9合并单位;P = .031])。与DCD-NMP组相比,DCD-SCS组在再灌注后给予氨甲环酸的频率更高(13% [95% CI, 5.7%-17.4%] vs 3.9% [95% CI, 1.1%-9.6% 95%];P = .018)。结论:在DCD肝移植中,与使用SCS相比,使用NMP可降低PRS的发生率,降低同种异体移植物再灌注时血管加压素和肌力的需求。此外,NMP与所有血液制品成分的输血减少以及再灌注后抗纤溶药物的使用有关。DCD-NMP组在移植后24小时内输血负担也有所减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信