{"title":"Awareness as an alternative to abandonment? Critical notice of Herman Cappelen’s The Concept of Democracy","authors":"Delia Belleri","doi":"10.1007/s44204-025-00240-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Herman Cappelen’s book <i>The Concept of Democracy</i> makes a case for ‘abolitionism’, that is, abandonment of the word ‘democracy’ and related terminology (‘D-words’). Cappelen’s strategy includes a direct argument for abandonment, aiming to show that D-words are meaningless; and an indirect argument, based on a comparison of abandonment with other options (for instance, replacement or amelioration). In this critical notice, I focus on his comparative case, arguing that the competing options and their respective challenges are not so well demarcated—where this negatively affects the abandonment proposal. Furthermore, I present and defend a yet unexplored alternative: awareness. Awareness is a worthy candidate for its little costs and significant benefits in comparison to abandonment, thus deserving consideration alongside the options assessed by Cappelen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-025-00240-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-025-00240-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Herman Cappelen’s book The Concept of Democracy makes a case for ‘abolitionism’, that is, abandonment of the word ‘democracy’ and related terminology (‘D-words’). Cappelen’s strategy includes a direct argument for abandonment, aiming to show that D-words are meaningless; and an indirect argument, based on a comparison of abandonment with other options (for instance, replacement or amelioration). In this critical notice, I focus on his comparative case, arguing that the competing options and their respective challenges are not so well demarcated—where this negatively affects the abandonment proposal. Furthermore, I present and defend a yet unexplored alternative: awareness. Awareness is a worthy candidate for its little costs and significant benefits in comparison to abandonment, thus deserving consideration alongside the options assessed by Cappelen.
赫尔曼·卡佩伦(Herman Cappelen)在《民主的概念》(The Concept of Democracy)一书中提出了“废除主义”,即放弃“民主”一词和相关术语(“D-words”)。Cappelen的策略包括对放弃的直接论证,旨在表明d字是无意义的;另一种是间接论证,基于对放弃与其他选择(例如,替换或改进)的比较。在这个关键的通知中,我将重点放在他的比较案例上,认为竞争的选择及其各自的挑战并没有很好地界定,这对放弃建议产生了负面影响。此外,我提出并捍卫一个尚未探索的替代方案:意识。与放弃相比,意识是一个值得考虑的选择,因为它的成本低,收益显著,因此值得与Cappelen评估的选择一起考虑。