Comparison of the efficacy of repeated greater occipital nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic migraine patients: a randomized controlled study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.22514/jofph.2024.031
Esra Ertilav, Osman Nuri Aydın
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of repeated greater occipital nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic migraine patients: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Esra Ertilav, Osman Nuri Aydın","doi":"10.22514/jofph.2024.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve (GON) block and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment in chronic migraine patients. Seventy patients admitted to the Neurology and Algology outpatient clinic between September 2023 and December 2023 and diagnosed with chronic migraine according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd Edition (ICHD-3) criteria were included in the study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive ultrasound-guided repeated GON block and PRF. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain relief and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores for disability were recorded before the procedure and at 1st and 6th months after the procedure. In both groups, 35 patients with greater occipital nerve (GON) block, 32 patients with GON PRF, the pain scores at 1st and 6th months post-procedure were significantly lower compared to before the procedure (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). VAS scores were significantly lower in the PRF group than in the GON block group at 6th month (<i>p</i> = 0.009). In both groups, post-procedural MIDAS scores at 1st and 6th months were significantly lower compared to before the procedure (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). In the GON PRF group, MIDAS scores at 6th month were significantly lower than MIDAS scores at 1st month (<i>p</i> < 0.001). MIDAS scores were significantly lower in the PRF group compared to the GON block group at 6th months (<i>p</i> < 0.001).Interventional procedures such as GON block and PRF are safe and effective methods in chronic migraine. PRF is a better alternative to GON block in chronic migraine with longer effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"38 3","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jofph.2024.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of greater occipital nerve (GON) block and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment in chronic migraine patients. Seventy patients admitted to the Neurology and Algology outpatient clinic between September 2023 and December 2023 and diagnosed with chronic migraine according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd Edition (ICHD-3) criteria were included in the study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive ultrasound-guided repeated GON block and PRF. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain relief and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores for disability were recorded before the procedure and at 1st and 6th months after the procedure. In both groups, 35 patients with greater occipital nerve (GON) block, 32 patients with GON PRF, the pain scores at 1st and 6th months post-procedure were significantly lower compared to before the procedure (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). VAS scores were significantly lower in the PRF group than in the GON block group at 6th month (p = 0.009). In both groups, post-procedural MIDAS scores at 1st and 6th months were significantly lower compared to before the procedure (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). In the GON PRF group, MIDAS scores at 6th month were significantly lower than MIDAS scores at 1st month (p < 0.001). MIDAS scores were significantly lower in the PRF group compared to the GON block group at 6th months (p < 0.001).Interventional procedures such as GON block and PRF are safe and effective methods in chronic migraine. PRF is a better alternative to GON block in chronic migraine with longer effectiveness.

反复大枕神经阻滞和脉冲射频治疗慢性偏头痛患者疗效的比较:一项随机对照研究。
本研究的目的是比较大枕神经(GON)阻滞和脉冲射频(PRF)治疗慢性偏头痛患者的有效性。根据国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3)标准,研究纳入了2023年9月至2023年12月期间入住神经病学和Algology门诊并诊断为慢性偏头痛的70例患者。将患者随机分为两组,分别接受超声引导下的反复GON阻滞和PRF治疗。术前、术后1个月和6个月分别记录疼痛缓解的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)评分。两组大枕神经阻滞患者35例,大枕神经PRF患者32例,术后1、6个月疼痛评分均显著低于术前(p < 0.001, p < 0.001)。第6个月时,PRF组的VAS评分明显低于GON阻断组(p = 0.009)。两组患者术后第1个月和第6个月的MIDAS评分均显著低于术前(p < 0.001, p < 0.001)。在GON PRF组,第6个月的MIDAS评分显著低于第1个月的MIDAS评分(p < 0.001)。第6个月时,PRF组的MIDAS评分明显低于GON阻断组(p < 0.001)。介入治疗慢性偏头痛是安全有效的治疗方法。在慢性偏头痛中,PRF是一种较好的替代素阻断的治疗方法,且疗效较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信