Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Matthew R Grace, Brighton Goodhue, Neeta L Vora
{"title":"Rho(D) immune globulin shortage and fetal Rh(D) screening with cell-free DNA.","authors":"Matthew R Grace, Brighton Goodhue, Neeta L Vora","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite the availability of Rh(D) immune globulin (RhIg) to prevent alloimmunization in Rh(D)-negative pregnant patients, anti-Rh(D) alloimmunization remains a prevalent cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent RhIg shortages have caused clinicians and professional societies to identify methods to prioritize RhIg administration. New cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests to predict fetal red blood cell antigen genotypes have been proposed as an option to prioritize the administration of RhIg to Rh(D)-negative pregnant people.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Commercial laboratories offer fetal Rh(D) genotype testing as part of cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Studies indicate that these tests have a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of fetal Rh(D) status. Considering the current RhIg shortage, the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests that utilizing cfDNA tests to determine fetal Rh(D) status is a reasonable approach to prioritize RhIg administration when supply is limited.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>cfDNA screening for fetal Rh(D) status is a reasonable approach to triage the administration of RhIg in the setting of the current RhIg shortage. Utilization of cfDNA screening for fetal Rh(D) and other red blood cell antigen status is likely to increase in routine care. Research, professional society guidance, and education are necessary to ensure well tolerated and equitable utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"55-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Despite the availability of Rh(D) immune globulin (RhIg) to prevent alloimmunization in Rh(D)-negative pregnant patients, anti-Rh(D) alloimmunization remains a prevalent cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent RhIg shortages have caused clinicians and professional societies to identify methods to prioritize RhIg administration. New cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests to predict fetal red blood cell antigen genotypes have been proposed as an option to prioritize the administration of RhIg to Rh(D)-negative pregnant people.

Recent findings: Commercial laboratories offer fetal Rh(D) genotype testing as part of cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Studies indicate that these tests have a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of fetal Rh(D) status. Considering the current RhIg shortage, the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests that utilizing cfDNA tests to determine fetal Rh(D) status is a reasonable approach to prioritize RhIg administration when supply is limited.

Summary: cfDNA screening for fetal Rh(D) status is a reasonable approach to triage the administration of RhIg in the setting of the current RhIg shortage. Utilization of cfDNA screening for fetal Rh(D) and other red blood cell antigen status is likely to increase in routine care. Research, professional society guidance, and education are necessary to ensure well tolerated and equitable utilization.

Rho(D)免疫球蛋白缺乏和胎儿Rh(D)无细胞DNA筛查。
综述目的:尽管Rh(D)免疫球蛋白(RhIg)可预防Rh(D)阴性妊娠患者的同种异体免疫,但抗Rh(D)同种异体免疫仍然是胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病(HDFN)的普遍原因。最近的RhIg短缺已经导致临床医生和专业协会确定方法来优先考虑RhIg的管理。新的无细胞DNA (cfDNA)检测预测胎儿红细胞抗原基因型已被提议作为优先给Rh(D)阴性孕妇给予RhIg的一种选择。最近发现:商业实验室提供胎儿Rh(D)基因型检测作为胎儿非整倍体cfDNA筛查的一部分。研究表明,这些试验对胎儿Rh(D)状态的检测具有很高的敏感性和特异性。考虑到目前的RhIg短缺,美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)建议,在供应有限的情况下,利用cfDNA检测来确定胎儿Rh(D)状态是优先给予RhIg的合理方法。总结:cfDNA筛查胎儿Rh(D)状态是在当前RhIg短缺的情况下分类给予RhIg的合理方法。利用cfDNA筛查胎儿Rh(D)和其他红细胞抗原状态可能会增加在常规护理。研究、专业协会指导和教育是确保良好容忍和公平利用的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信