Advantages of the standardized use of preoperative fascia iliaca block versus conventional analgesia in older adults with fragility hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Colombia.

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Andrés Libos Zabala, Jonathan Tihanyi Feldman, Juan D Bernate, Laura Ricaurte, Diana C Morales, Aldo F Patiño, Rodrigo F Pesantez, Julián E Salavarrieta, Valentina Sanint, Ana M López, Carlos M Olarte
{"title":"Advantages of the standardized use of preoperative fascia iliaca block versus conventional analgesia in older adults with fragility hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Colombia.","authors":"Andrés Libos Zabala, Jonathan Tihanyi Feldman, Juan D Bernate, Laura Ricaurte, Diana C Morales, Aldo F Patiño, Rodrigo F Pesantez, Julián E Salavarrieta, Valentina Sanint, Ana M López, Carlos M Olarte","doi":"10.1177/00368504241305904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Hospital admission due to fragility hip fracture has increased significantly in recent years. In patients with hip fracture, perioperative pain management is usually with opioids, whose dosage is difficult to adjust and have many side effects, especially in older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact and the advantages of the implementation of the fascia iliaca blockade in older adults with hip fracture due to fragility included in the Orthogeriatric Clinical Care Center of the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá and the San José Infantil University Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. The primary outcome of our study is the incidence of delirium during hospitalization. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The data was collected from patients older than 65 years treated for a fragility fracture of the hip in two fourth-level hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia from the beginning of 2019 until the end of 2020. <b>Results:</b> A sample of 218 patients was obtained, of which 119 received conventional analgesic management. 99 patients underwent fascia iliaca blockade. No significant difference was found between the use of the block and the development of delirium (<i>p</i> = 0.442). There was a higher consumption of opioids in the conventional analgesia group compared to the block group (27.61 mg vs 16.34 mg, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.003), longer duration of the surgical procedure (90.84 vs 81.08 min, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.030) and longer hospital stay (6.06 vs 5.41 days, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.641). <b>Conclusions:</b> While this study found no significant difference in the incidence of delirium, fascia iliaca blockade was associated with significant reductions in opioid consumption and shorter procedural times. These findings suggest that fascia iliaca blockade may improve pain management efficiency in older adults with hip fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 1","pages":"368504241305904"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241305904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital admission due to fragility hip fracture has increased significantly in recent years. In patients with hip fracture, perioperative pain management is usually with opioids, whose dosage is difficult to adjust and have many side effects, especially in older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact and the advantages of the implementation of the fascia iliaca blockade in older adults with hip fracture due to fragility included in the Orthogeriatric Clinical Care Center of the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá and the San José Infantil University Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. The primary outcome of our study is the incidence of delirium during hospitalization. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The data was collected from patients older than 65 years treated for a fragility fracture of the hip in two fourth-level hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia from the beginning of 2019 until the end of 2020. Results: A sample of 218 patients was obtained, of which 119 received conventional analgesic management. 99 patients underwent fascia iliaca blockade. No significant difference was found between the use of the block and the development of delirium (p = 0.442). There was a higher consumption of opioids in the conventional analgesia group compared to the block group (27.61 mg vs 16.34 mg, respectively, p = 0.003), longer duration of the surgical procedure (90.84 vs 81.08 min, respectively, p = 0.030) and longer hospital stay (6.06 vs 5.41 days, respectively, p = 0.641). Conclusions: While this study found no significant difference in the incidence of delirium, fascia iliaca blockade was associated with significant reductions in opioid consumption and shorter procedural times. These findings suggest that fascia iliaca blockade may improve pain management efficiency in older adults with hip fractures.

术前髂筋膜阻滞与常规镇痛对老年人脆性髋部骨折的优势:哥伦比亚两家医院的回顾性队列研究
导读:近年来,因脆性髋部骨折住院人数明显增加。在髋部骨折患者中,围手术期疼痛管理通常使用阿片类药物,其剂量难以调节且有许多副作用,特别是在老年人中。本研究的目的是确定髂筋膜封锁术对在哥伦比亚波哥大圣达菲骨科临床护理中心和圣何塞婴儿大学医院实施的因脆性髋部骨折的老年人的影响和优势。我们研究的主要结果是住院期间谵妄的发生率。方法:采用回顾性观察队列研究。这些数据是从2019年初至2020年底在哥伦比亚波哥大的两家四级医院接受髋部脆性骨折治疗的65岁以上患者中收集的。结果:218例患者接受常规镇痛治疗,其中119例接受常规镇痛治疗。99例患者行髂筋膜阻滞。使用阻滞与谵妄的发生无显著性差异(p = 0.442)。与阻滞组相比,常规镇痛组阿片类药物的消耗量更高(分别为27.61 mg对16.34 mg, p = 0.003),手术时间更长(分别为90.84对81.08分钟,p = 0.030),住院时间更长(分别为6.06对5.41天,p = 0.641)。结论:虽然本研究没有发现谵妄发生率的显著差异,但髂筋膜阻断与阿片类药物消耗的显著减少和手术时间的缩短有关。这些发现表明髂筋膜阻断可以提高老年髋部骨折患者的疼痛管理效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信