Exploring reduction of prolonged binocular vision testing time: the agreement between the first and second thirty seconds within one minute of accommodative and vergence facility tests.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Charles Darko-Takyi, Sandra Owusu, Emmanuel K Abu, Carl H Abraham, Michael Ntodie, Ebenezer Manu, Kumi O Boakye, Victoria Yirrah, Emmanuel Essien, Kwame O Osei, Stephen Ocansey
{"title":"Exploring reduction of prolonged binocular vision testing time: the agreement between the first and second thirty seconds within one minute of accommodative and vergence facility tests.","authors":"Charles Darko-Takyi, Sandra Owusu, Emmanuel K Abu, Carl H Abraham, Michael Ntodie, Ebenezer Manu, Kumi O Boakye, Victoria Yirrah, Emmanuel Essien, Kwame O Osei, Stephen Ocansey","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2024.2449178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose:</i> The study sought to compare the number of cycles (NOS) for the first and second thirty-seconds (FASTS) within 1 min of accommodative facility (AF) and vergence facility (VF) testing to explore possibilities of reducing testing time to 30 s. <i>Methods:</i> In this cross-sectional study, a multistage sample of school children (aged 8-17 years) was taken through ocular-visual screening. Eligible participants (586) underwent refraction, stereo-acuity measurement, AF testing using ± 2D lens flippers, and VF testing using 3<sup>Δ</sup> BI/12<sup>Δ</sup> BO flipper prisms. The NOS within the FASTS of AF and VF tests were compared, respectively. <i>Results:</i> A statistically insignificant mean difference of 0.01 cycles was found between the NOS for the FASTS of monocular AF in the right eye (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, <i>p</i> = .715). Statistically significant differences of 0.06, 0.14, and 0.09 cycles (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, <i>p</i> < .05) which are not clinically meaningful were found for monocular AF in the left eye, binocular AF, and VF with no level of agreement on Bland Altman analysis, respectively. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the first 30-s cycles multiplied by two (FTSMT) and the full 1-min test period cycles for monocular AF, binocular AF, and VF. <i>Conclusion:</i> The FTSMT approach may be applied during gross screening to shorten testing time as further study is recommended for its diagnostic validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2024.2449178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study sought to compare the number of cycles (NOS) for the first and second thirty-seconds (FASTS) within 1 min of accommodative facility (AF) and vergence facility (VF) testing to explore possibilities of reducing testing time to 30 s. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a multistage sample of school children (aged 8-17 years) was taken through ocular-visual screening. Eligible participants (586) underwent refraction, stereo-acuity measurement, AF testing using ± 2D lens flippers, and VF testing using 3Δ BI/12Δ BO flipper prisms. The NOS within the FASTS of AF and VF tests were compared, respectively. Results: A statistically insignificant mean difference of 0.01 cycles was found between the NOS for the FASTS of monocular AF in the right eye (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, p = .715). Statistically significant differences of 0.06, 0.14, and 0.09 cycles (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, p < .05) which are not clinically meaningful were found for monocular AF in the left eye, binocular AF, and VF with no level of agreement on Bland Altman analysis, respectively. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the first 30-s cycles multiplied by two (FTSMT) and the full 1-min test period cycles for monocular AF, binocular AF, and VF. Conclusion: The FTSMT approach may be applied during gross screening to shorten testing time as further study is recommended for its diagnostic validity.

探索减少延长的双眼视力测试时间:调节和收敛设施测试一分钟内的第一和第二30秒之间的一致性。
目的:本研究旨在比较调节设施(AF)和收敛设施(VF)测试的第一和第二30秒(fast)在1分钟内的循环次数(NOS),以探讨将测试时间缩短至30秒的可能性。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对8-17岁学龄儿童进行多阶段眼视力检查。符合条件的参与者(586人)进行了折射、立体视力测量、使用±2D透镜鳍片进行AF测试和使用3Δ BI/12Δ BO鳍片棱镜进行VF测试。比较AF和VF两组快速反应时间内NOS的变化。结果:右眼单眼房颤fass的NOS平均差异为0.01个周期,差异无统计学意义(Wilcoxon sign Rank检验,p = .715)。结论:FTSMT方法可应用于粗筛,缩短检测时间,建议进一步研究其诊断有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信