A New Method to Measure Ocular Surface Sensitivity: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Liquid Jet Esthesiometer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klaus Ehrmann, Cristian Talens-Estarelles, Fiona Stapleton, Brenda Truong, Jessica Chen, Blanka Golebiowski
{"title":"A New Method to Measure Ocular Surface Sensitivity: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Liquid Jet Esthesiometer.","authors":"Klaus Ehrmann, Cristian Talens-Estarelles, Fiona Stapleton, Brenda Truong, Jessica Chen, Blanka Golebiowski","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the reliability of the liquid jet esthesiometer (LJA) for measurement of corneal sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two separate studies were conducted to assess intrasession repeatability (study 1) and intersession reproducibility (study 2) of corneal sensitivity measured using the LJA. Thirty participants (13 female and 17 male participants, age 23±6 years) participated in study 1 and another 30 (18 female and 12 male participants, 35±10 years) participated in study 2. For study 1, mechanical sensation threshold of the central cornea was measured three times on the same day, with a 30-min break between repeats. For study 2, central corneal sensation threshold was measured on five different days by one of eight randomly assigned examiners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corneal sensation thresholds obtained in studies 1 and 2 were 2.3±1.0 and 2.5±1.2 μL, respectively. No significant differences between repeated measurements were obtained in either study (P≥0.19). Thresholds were lower (i.e., corneal sensitivity was higher) in female than male participants (2.1±1.0 vs. 2.7±0.9 μL in male participants, P=0.02) but were not affected by contact lens wear. Clinical reliability of the LJA was good for intrasession repeatability (coefficient of repeatability ±1.6 μL, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74, within-subject coefficient of variation (CVW) 24%) and moderate for intersession reproducibility (Coefficient of Reproducibility ±2.2 μL, CVW 32%). Measurement variability was independent of threshold level (P=0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LJA offers good clinical repeatability and is a reliable tool to measure corneal sensitivity in different population groups, regardless of stimulus thresholds. Day-to-day fluctuations in corneal sensitivity probably account for the relatively lower reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reliability of the liquid jet esthesiometer (LJA) for measurement of corneal sensitivity.

Methods: Two separate studies were conducted to assess intrasession repeatability (study 1) and intersession reproducibility (study 2) of corneal sensitivity measured using the LJA. Thirty participants (13 female and 17 male participants, age 23±6 years) participated in study 1 and another 30 (18 female and 12 male participants, 35±10 years) participated in study 2. For study 1, mechanical sensation threshold of the central cornea was measured three times on the same day, with a 30-min break between repeats. For study 2, central corneal sensation threshold was measured on five different days by one of eight randomly assigned examiners.

Results: Corneal sensation thresholds obtained in studies 1 and 2 were 2.3±1.0 and 2.5±1.2 μL, respectively. No significant differences between repeated measurements were obtained in either study (P≥0.19). Thresholds were lower (i.e., corneal sensitivity was higher) in female than male participants (2.1±1.0 vs. 2.7±0.9 μL in male participants, P=0.02) but were not affected by contact lens wear. Clinical reliability of the LJA was good for intrasession repeatability (coefficient of repeatability ±1.6 μL, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74, within-subject coefficient of variation (CVW) 24%) and moderate for intersession reproducibility (Coefficient of Reproducibility ±2.2 μL, CVW 32%). Measurement variability was independent of threshold level (P=0.84).

Conclusions: The LJA offers good clinical repeatability and is a reliable tool to measure corneal sensitivity in different population groups, regardless of stimulus thresholds. Day-to-day fluctuations in corneal sensitivity probably account for the relatively lower reproducibility.

一种测量眼表灵敏度的新方法:液体喷射感测仪的重复性和再现性。
目的:评价液体喷射感受器(LJA)测量角膜灵敏度的可靠性。方法:进行了两项独立的研究,以评估使用LJA测量的角膜灵敏度的眼内重复性(研究1)和眼间重复性(研究2)。30名参与者(女性13名,男性17名,年龄23±6岁)参加了研究1,另外30名参与者(女性18名,男性12名,年龄35±10岁)参加了研究2。在研究1中,在同一天测量三次中央角膜的机械感觉阈值,每次测量间隔30分钟。在研究2中,中央角膜感觉阈值由随机分配的8名检查员中的1人在5个不同的日子里测量。结果:研究1和研究2获得的角膜感觉阈值分别为2.3±1.0和2.5±1.2 μL。两项研究中重复测量结果无显著差异(P≥0.19)。女性受试者的阈值较男性受试者低(即角膜敏感度较高)(男性受试者为2.1±1.0 μL vs. 2.7±0.9 μL, P=0.02),但不受隐形眼镜佩戴的影响。LJA的临床信度具有良好的组内重复性(重复性系数±1.6 μL,组内相关系数0.74,组内变异系数(CVW) 24%)和中等的组间重复性(重复性系数±2.2 μL, CVW 32%)。测量变异性与阈值水平无关(P=0.84)。结论:无论刺激阈值如何,LJA具有良好的临床重复性,是测量不同人群角膜敏感性的可靠工具。角膜敏感度的日常波动可能是重复性相对较低的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信