Does smooth mean simple? The impact of tactile experience on judgments of difficulty.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Weirui Xiong, Lu Yu, Hai Yang, Keyan Liu
{"title":"Does smooth mean simple? The impact of tactile experience on judgments of difficulty.","authors":"Weirui Xiong, Lu Yu, Hai Yang, Keyan Liu","doi":"10.1177/03010066241301313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People often associate roughness with difficulty, as a figure of speech. Studies have shown that there is a metaphorical connection between the concept of rough versus smooth feel and the degree of difficulty. However, it has not been determined whether rough and smooth tactile experiences influence judgments of perceived task difficulty from the perspective of physical metaphors. This study used the Stroop experimental paradigm and the metaphorical experimental paradigm to investigate the effects of rough and smooth haptic experiences on difficulty judgments of perceptual tasks in two experiments. (1) There is a psychological reality of \"difficult concept-rough touch\" and \"easy concept-smooth touch,\" linking the concept of roughness to the rough/smooth touch metaphor; (2) The physical tactile experience of roughness/smoothness had an effect on perceptual task difficulty judgments. After the experience of roughness, participants tended to judge the difficulty as high, while after the experience of smoothness, participants tended to judge the difficulty as low. Rough and smooth haptics affect perceptual task difficulty judgments, and rough and smooth haptic experiences polarize difficulty judgments in the embodied condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066241301313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066241301313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People often associate roughness with difficulty, as a figure of speech. Studies have shown that there is a metaphorical connection between the concept of rough versus smooth feel and the degree of difficulty. However, it has not been determined whether rough and smooth tactile experiences influence judgments of perceived task difficulty from the perspective of physical metaphors. This study used the Stroop experimental paradigm and the metaphorical experimental paradigm to investigate the effects of rough and smooth haptic experiences on difficulty judgments of perceptual tasks in two experiments. (1) There is a psychological reality of "difficult concept-rough touch" and "easy concept-smooth touch," linking the concept of roughness to the rough/smooth touch metaphor; (2) The physical tactile experience of roughness/smoothness had an effect on perceptual task difficulty judgments. After the experience of roughness, participants tended to judge the difficulty as high, while after the experience of smoothness, participants tended to judge the difficulty as low. Rough and smooth haptics affect perceptual task difficulty judgments, and rough and smooth haptic experiences polarize difficulty judgments in the embodied condition.

平滑意味着简单吗?触觉经验对难度判断的影响。
作为一种比喻,人们常常把粗糙和困难联系在一起。研究表明,粗糙感和平滑感的概念与难度之间存在隐喻性联系。然而,从物理隐喻的角度来看,粗糙和光滑的触觉体验是否会影响感知任务难度的判断,尚未得到明确的研究结果。本研究采用Stroop实验范式和隐喻实验范式,研究粗糙和光滑的触觉体验对知觉任务难度判断的影响。(1)存在“难概念-粗糙触摸”和“易概念-光滑触摸”的心理现实,将粗糙概念与粗糙/光滑触摸隐喻联系起来;(2)粗糙/光滑的物理触觉体验对知觉任务难度判断有影响。经历粗糙后,被试倾向于判断难度高,而经历光滑后,被试倾向于判断难度低。粗糙和平滑的触觉体验影响知觉任务难度判断,粗糙和平滑的触觉体验使具身条件下的难度判断极化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信