Oocytes Quality Assessment-The Current Insight: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Marjanu Hikmah Elias, Norazilah Mat Jin, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Saiful Effendi Syafruddin, Ani Amelia Zainuddin, Nao Suzuki, Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim
{"title":"Oocytes Quality Assessment-The Current Insight: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Marjanu Hikmah Elias, Norazilah Mat Jin, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Saiful Effendi Syafruddin, Ani Amelia Zainuddin, Nao Suzuki, Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim","doi":"10.3390/biology13120978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An overall in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome is dynamic. Good oocyte quality is important for achieving a better IVF pregnancy. Various methods have been used for OQ assessment (OQA). However, due to inconclusive evidence, one method's superiority has not been proposed over others. Thus, OQA should be consolidated based on the current evidence for this matter. Our study aims to summarize the current OQA used and compare their recommended methods. Our results revealed that the optimal OQA for cost-effectiveness and clinical implementation is still via morphological assessment. The current method most opted for is total oocyte scoring. Although other methods-follicular fluid evaluation, mitochondria spindle assessment, or live zona imaging-can be applied with better precision, due to cost, additional tools, and expertise, and they should cater to research purposes and selected centers. Our results added value as a current strategy for optimizing OQA in IVF practice, aiming at cost-effectiveness and reproducibility for better clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13120978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An overall in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome is dynamic. Good oocyte quality is important for achieving a better IVF pregnancy. Various methods have been used for OQ assessment (OQA). However, due to inconclusive evidence, one method's superiority has not been proposed over others. Thus, OQA should be consolidated based on the current evidence for this matter. Our study aims to summarize the current OQA used and compare their recommended methods. Our results revealed that the optimal OQA for cost-effectiveness and clinical implementation is still via morphological assessment. The current method most opted for is total oocyte scoring. Although other methods-follicular fluid evaluation, mitochondria spindle assessment, or live zona imaging-can be applied with better precision, due to cost, additional tools, and expertise, and they should cater to research purposes and selected centers. Our results added value as a current strategy for optimizing OQA in IVF practice, aiming at cost-effectiveness and reproducibility for better clinical implementation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信