Do reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship websites reflect a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion?

Jasmine Eliwa M.D. , Patricia J. Goedecke M.S. , Jim Wan Ph.D. , Rachel Weinerman M.D. , Joseph Findley M.D. , Rebecca Flyckt M.D.
{"title":"Do reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship websites reflect a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion?","authors":"Jasmine Eliwa M.D. ,&nbsp;Patricia J. Goedecke M.S. ,&nbsp;Jim Wan Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Rachel Weinerman M.D. ,&nbsp;Joseph Findley M.D. ,&nbsp;Rebecca Flyckt M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the frequency of diversity elements (DEs) in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowship websites and analyze these elements according to program characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Forty-nine REI fellowship websites were assessed for 20 DEs that represent programmatic commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Program websites were categorized by the number of discrete DEs featured: low (0–6); moderate (7–13); or high (14–20). Data were analyzed via R statistical software.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>The primary outcome was the level of DEs featured within REI fellowship websites. The secondary outcome was the association between DEs and program geographic region and accreditation status.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>Program websites had a mean of 3 DEs. No program had a high number of DEs. Eighty-four percent of programs were low in DEs, with 16% exhibiting moderate DEs. Within the moderate group, most programs featured photographs of faculty (63%) and fellows (88%), commitment to DEI message (88%), diversity-specific language (88%), DEI webpage (88%), and DEI-related resources/opportunities (100%). In the low group, most programs presented photographs of faculty and fellows (71%). Programs did not feature active recruitment strategies (unconscious bias, holistic application review, DEI statistics, and implicit bias training). Diversity element category was not associated with program location. Programs with “initial accreditation” had the highest mean DEs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>None of the REI fellowship websites demonstrated high levels of DEs. We speculate that by intentionally incorporating DEs into fellowship websites, programs can more effectively recruit underrepresented fellows and enhance the diversity of REI practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the frequency of diversity elements (DEs) in reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowship websites and analyze these elements according to program characteristics.

Design

Forty-nine REI fellowship websites were assessed for 20 DEs that represent programmatic commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Program websites were categorized by the number of discrete DEs featured: low (0–6); moderate (7–13); or high (14–20). Data were analyzed via R statistical software.

Setting

Not applicable.

Patient(s)

Not applicable.

Exposure

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

The primary outcome was the level of DEs featured within REI fellowship websites. The secondary outcome was the association between DEs and program geographic region and accreditation status.

Result(s)

Program websites had a mean of 3 DEs. No program had a high number of DEs. Eighty-four percent of programs were low in DEs, with 16% exhibiting moderate DEs. Within the moderate group, most programs featured photographs of faculty (63%) and fellows (88%), commitment to DEI message (88%), diversity-specific language (88%), DEI webpage (88%), and DEI-related resources/opportunities (100%). In the low group, most programs presented photographs of faculty and fellows (71%). Programs did not feature active recruitment strategies (unconscious bias, holistic application review, DEI statistics, and implicit bias training). Diversity element category was not associated with program location. Programs with “initial accreditation” had the highest mean DEs.

Conclusion(s)

None of the REI fellowship websites demonstrated high levels of DEs. We speculate that by intentionally incorporating DEs into fellowship websites, programs can more effectively recruit underrepresented fellows and enhance the diversity of REI practitioners.
生殖内分泌学和不孕症奖学金网站是否反映了对多样性、公平性和包容性的承诺?
目的:了解生殖内分泌与不孕症(REI)联谊网站多样性要素(DEs)出现频率,并根据栏目特点对其进行分析。设计:对49个REI奖学金网站进行了20个de评估,这些de代表了对多样性,公平性和包容性(DEI)的程序性承诺。节目网站根据离散de的数量进行分类:低(0-6);中度(7 - 13);或高(14-20)。数据通过R统计软件进行分析。设置:不适用。病人:不适用。暴露:不适用。主要结局指标:主要结局指标是REI奖学金网站中出现的DEs水平。次要结果是de与项目地理区域和认证状态之间的关系。结果:项目网站平均有3个de,没有一个项目有大量de。84%的项目de较低,16%的项目de中等。在中等群体中,大多数项目都有教师(63%)和研究员(88%)的照片,对DEI信息的承诺(88%),多样性特定语言(88%),DEI网页(88%)和DEI相关资源/机会(100%)。在低组中,大多数项目都展示了教师和研究员的照片(71%)。这些项目没有积极的招聘策略(无意识偏见、整体申请审查、DEI统计和隐性偏见培训)。多样性元素类别与程序位置无关。结论:没有一个REI奖学金网站显示出高水平的de。我们推测,通过有意地将de纳入奖学金网站,项目可以更有效地招募代表性不足的研究员,并增强REI从业者的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信