Clinical practice of one-lung ventilation in mainland China: a nationwide questionnaire survey.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hong-Jin Liu, Yong Lin, Wang Li, Hai Yang, Wen-Yue Kang, Pei-Lei Guo, Xiao-Hui Guo, Ning-Ning Cheng, Jie-Chao Tan, Yi-Na He, Si-Si Chen, Yan Mu, Xian-Wen Liu, Hui Zhang, Mei-Fang Chen
{"title":"Clinical practice of one-lung ventilation in mainland China: a nationwide questionnaire survey.","authors":"Hong-Jin Liu, Yong Lin, Wang Li, Hai Yang, Wen-Yue Kang, Pei-Lei Guo, Xiao-Hui Guo, Ning-Ning Cheng, Jie-Chao Tan, Yi-Na He, Si-Si Chen, Yan Mu, Xian-Wen Liu, Hui Zhang, Mei-Fang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02879-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited information is available regarding the application of lung-protective ventilation strategies during one-lung ventilation (OLV) across mainland China. A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate this issue in current clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey covered various aspects, including respondent demographics, the establishment and maintenance of OLV, intraoperative monitoring standards, and complications associated with OLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred forty-three valid responses were collected from all provinces in mainland China. Volume control ventilation mode, 4 to 6 mL per kilogram of predictive body weight, pure oxygen inspiration, and a low-level positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O were the most popular ventilation parameters. The most common thresholds of intraoperative respiration monitoring were peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) of 90-94%, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> of 45 to 55 mm Hg, and an airway pressure of 30 to 34 cm H<sub>2</sub>O. Recruitment maneuvers were traditionally performed by 94% of the respondents. Intraoperative hypoxemia and laryngeal injury were experienced by 75% and 51% of the respondents, respectively. The proportions of anesthesiologists who frequently experienced hypoxemia during OLV were 19%, 24%, and 7% for lung, cardiovascular, and esophageal surgeries, respectively. Up to 32% of respondents were reluctant to perform lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the volume-control ventilation mode and an SpO<sub>2</sub> intervention threshold of < 85% were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV in lung and cardiovascular surgeries. In esophageal surgery, working in a tier 2 hospital and using traditional ventilation strategies were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in intraoperative hypoxemia during OLV between respondents who performed lung-protective ventilation strategies and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV have been widely accepted in mainland China and are strongly recommended for esophageal surgery, particularly in tier 2 hospitals. Implementing volume control ventilation mode and early management of oxygen desaturation might prevent hypoxemia during OLV.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02879-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited information is available regarding the application of lung-protective ventilation strategies during one-lung ventilation (OLV) across mainland China. A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate this issue in current clinical practice.

Methods: The survey covered various aspects, including respondent demographics, the establishment and maintenance of OLV, intraoperative monitoring standards, and complications associated with OLV.

Results: Five hundred forty-three valid responses were collected from all provinces in mainland China. Volume control ventilation mode, 4 to 6 mL per kilogram of predictive body weight, pure oxygen inspiration, and a low-level positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 5 cm H2O were the most popular ventilation parameters. The most common thresholds of intraoperative respiration monitoring were peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 90-94%, end-tidal CO2 of 45 to 55 mm Hg, and an airway pressure of 30 to 34 cm H2O. Recruitment maneuvers were traditionally performed by 94% of the respondents. Intraoperative hypoxemia and laryngeal injury were experienced by 75% and 51% of the respondents, respectively. The proportions of anesthesiologists who frequently experienced hypoxemia during OLV were 19%, 24%, and 7% for lung, cardiovascular, and esophageal surgeries, respectively. Up to 32% of respondents were reluctant to perform lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the volume-control ventilation mode and an SpO2 intervention threshold of < 85% were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV in lung and cardiovascular surgeries. In esophageal surgery, working in a tier 2 hospital and using traditional ventilation strategies were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in intraoperative hypoxemia during OLV between respondents who performed lung-protective ventilation strategies and those who did not.

Conclusions: Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV have been widely accepted in mainland China and are strongly recommended for esophageal surgery, particularly in tier 2 hospitals. Implementing volume control ventilation mode and early management of oxygen desaturation might prevent hypoxemia during OLV.

中国大陆地区单肺通气的临床实践:一项全国性问卷调查。
背景:关于中国大陆地区单肺通气(OLV)中肺保护通气策略的应用信息有限。在全国范围内进行问卷调查,以调查目前临床实践中的这一问题。方法:调查内容包括调查对象的人口统计、OLV的建立和维护、术中监测标准、OLV相关并发症等。结果:在中国大陆各省份共收集有效问卷543份。容积控制通气模式、4 ~ 6ml / kg预测体重、纯氧吸入、低水平呼气末正压≤5 cm H2O是最常用的通气参数。术中呼吸监测最常见的阈值为外周氧饱和度(SpO2) 90 ~ 94%,潮末CO2 45 ~ 55 mm Hg,气道压力30 ~ 34 cm H2O。传统上,94%的受访者执行招聘策略。术中低氧血症和喉部损伤的发生率分别为75%和51%。在肺、心血管和食管手术中,麻醉医师在OLV中经常出现低氧血症的比例分别为19%、24%和7%。多达32%的受访者不愿意在OLV期间执行肺保护性通气策略。结论:肺保护性通气策略在中国大陆地区已被广泛接受,并被强烈推荐用于食管手术,尤其是二级医院。实施容积控制通气模式和早期氧饱和度管理可防止OLV期间低氧血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信