The effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on perioperative innate immune function in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lotte M C Jacobs, Veerle Bijkerk, Lucas T van Eijk, Leo A B Joosten, Christiaan Keijzer, Jetze Visser, Michiel C Warlé
{"title":"The effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on perioperative innate immune function in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Lotte M C Jacobs, Veerle Bijkerk, Lucas T van Eijk, Leo A B Joosten, Christiaan Keijzer, Jetze Visser, Michiel C Warlé","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02883-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing evidence shows that postoperative innate immune dysregulation is associated with delayed recovery and infectious complications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general versus spinal anesthesia on innate immune function during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative matched cohort study used data from two single-center randomized-controlled trials. Patients from the control group of the HIPPO study received general anesthesia and were matched to control patients from the MAGIC study who received spinal anesthesia in a 2:1 ratio (general(n = 18); spinal(n = 9)). Immune function was assessed by determination of ex vivo cytokine production capacity upon whole blood stimulation with E. coli lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and measurement of plasma cytokines and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the general anesthesia group, ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β was significantly lower shortly after induction (p = 0.02) and both IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly lower at the end of surgery compared to the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). On postoperative day 1 (POD1), no differences were observed. Plasma cytokine concentrations did not differ between the spinal and general anesthesia group at most timepoints, except for IL-10 at the end of surgery (p = 0.04) and TNF on POD1 (p = 0.04), which were higher in the general anesthesia group. Plasma concentrations of DAMPs did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>General anesthesia has a transient impact on innate immune function in patients undergoing THA, but the clinical significance of anesthesia-induced innate immune dysregulation might be limited as no differences were observed on POD1.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The HIPPO study (NCT05562999, date of registration 2022-10-03) and MAGIC study (NCT05723406, date of registration 2023-02-10) are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02883-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence shows that postoperative innate immune dysregulation is associated with delayed recovery and infectious complications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general versus spinal anesthesia on innate immune function during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: This comparative matched cohort study used data from two single-center randomized-controlled trials. Patients from the control group of the HIPPO study received general anesthesia and were matched to control patients from the MAGIC study who received spinal anesthesia in a 2:1 ratio (general(n = 18); spinal(n = 9)). Immune function was assessed by determination of ex vivo cytokine production capacity upon whole blood stimulation with E. coli lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and measurement of plasma cytokines and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).

Results: In the general anesthesia group, ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β was significantly lower shortly after induction (p = 0.02) and both IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly lower at the end of surgery compared to the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). On postoperative day 1 (POD1), no differences were observed. Plasma cytokine concentrations did not differ between the spinal and general anesthesia group at most timepoints, except for IL-10 at the end of surgery (p = 0.04) and TNF on POD1 (p = 0.04), which were higher in the general anesthesia group. Plasma concentrations of DAMPs did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: General anesthesia has a transient impact on innate immune function in patients undergoing THA, but the clinical significance of anesthesia-induced innate immune dysregulation might be limited as no differences were observed on POD1.

Trial registration: The HIPPO study (NCT05562999, date of registration 2022-10-03) and MAGIC study (NCT05723406, date of registration 2023-02-10) are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉对全髋关节置换术患者围术期先天免疫功能的影响。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,术后先天免疫失调与延迟恢复和感染并发症有关。本研究的目的是比较全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉对全髋关节置换术期间和术后先天免疫功能的影响。方法:本比较匹配队列研究采用两项单中心随机对照试验的数据。HIPPO研究的对照组患者接受全身麻醉,并与MAGIC研究中接受脊髓麻醉的对照组患者按2:1的比例匹配(general(n = 18);脊柱(n = 9))。通过测定大肠杆菌脂多糖(LPS)刺激全血时体外细胞因子生产能力和测定血浆细胞因子和危险相关分子模式(DAMPs)来评估免疫功能。结果:全麻组诱导后不久体外细胞因子IL-1β产生能力显著低于脊髓麻醉组(p = 0.02),术末IL-1β和IL-6均显著低于脊髓麻醉组(p = 0.002和p = 0.02)。术后第1天(POD1),无差异。除手术结束时IL-10 (p = 0.04)和POD1时TNF (p = 0.04)高于全麻组外,脊髓组和全麻组在大多数时间点的血浆细胞因子浓度均无差异。两组间血浆DAMPs浓度无差异。结论:全身麻醉对全髋关节置换术患者的先天免疫功能有短暂性影响,但麻醉所致先天免疫失调的临床意义可能有限,因为在POD1上没有观察到差异。试验注册:HIPPO研究(NCT05562999,注册日期2022-10-03)和MAGIC研究(NCT05723406,注册日期2023-02-10)在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信