Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda
{"title":"Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.","authors":"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda","doi":"10.1159/000543296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.

Methods: We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.

Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.

Conclusion: In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信