Effect of intramuscular treatment with different iron dextran dosages and non-inferiority study to gleptoferron.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Isabel Hennig-Pauka, Martin Ganter, Dirk Bornhorn, Wesley Lyons, Enric Marco, Glen Almond, Bettina Schneider, Lothar Kreienbrock, Ken Steen Pedersen
{"title":"Effect of intramuscular treatment with different iron dextran dosages and non-inferiority study to gleptoferron.","authors":"Isabel Hennig-Pauka, Martin Ganter, Dirk Bornhorn, Wesley Lyons, Enric Marco, Glen Almond, Bettina Schneider, Lothar Kreienbrock, Ken Steen Pedersen","doi":"10.1186/s13028-024-00790-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prevention of iron deficiency in suckling piglets by intramuscular injection of a standardized amount of iron dextran or gleptoferron in the first days of life can lead to over- or underdosage with respective health risks. Currently, combined iron products containing an active substance against coccidia are also used on farms. When using a combination product targeting two diseases, an adjustment of the necessary amount of iron to prevent anaemia in the frame of a farm-specific treatment protocol is not possible. The aim of this study was to test if iron dextran, which can be used in flexible volumes, is statistically non-inferior to a combinatory product, containing gleptoferron and toltrazuril. In addition, different administration schemes for iron dextran with respect to time point and dosage were compared on a conventional farm. Within each out of 17 litters eight healthy piglets were allocated to one of the four treatment groups on the second day of life: (1) 200 mg iron dextran, (2) 200 mg gleptoferron and 45 mg toltrazuril in combination, (3) 300 mg iron dextran, (4) 200 mg iron dextran and additional intramuscular administration of 200 mg iron dextran on day 11 of life. Pigs of groups 1, 3 and 4 received toltrazuril orally. Red blood cell measures were determined prior to treatment on day 2 of life and at weaning. Body weights were measured on day 2, 24, 74 and 160 of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Iron dextran was non-inferior compared to gleptoferron within a tolerance range of ± 5 g haemoglobin/L. In total, treatment groups did not differ with respect to red blood cell parameters and average daily weight gain. The 50% pigs with intermediate birth weights profited from an additional iron dextran administration with respect to higher haemoglobin concentrations at weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this investigation gleptoferron and iron dextran appear equally appropriate for prevention of iron deficiency anaemia. Piglets of different birth weights might profit differently from an additional iron administration, so that usage of a product containing iron as a single substance is of advantage to allow a flexible adjustment of dosage during the suckling period.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"67 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00790-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prevention of iron deficiency in suckling piglets by intramuscular injection of a standardized amount of iron dextran or gleptoferron in the first days of life can lead to over- or underdosage with respective health risks. Currently, combined iron products containing an active substance against coccidia are also used on farms. When using a combination product targeting two diseases, an adjustment of the necessary amount of iron to prevent anaemia in the frame of a farm-specific treatment protocol is not possible. The aim of this study was to test if iron dextran, which can be used in flexible volumes, is statistically non-inferior to a combinatory product, containing gleptoferron and toltrazuril. In addition, different administration schemes for iron dextran with respect to time point and dosage were compared on a conventional farm. Within each out of 17 litters eight healthy piglets were allocated to one of the four treatment groups on the second day of life: (1) 200 mg iron dextran, (2) 200 mg gleptoferron and 45 mg toltrazuril in combination, (3) 300 mg iron dextran, (4) 200 mg iron dextran and additional intramuscular administration of 200 mg iron dextran on day 11 of life. Pigs of groups 1, 3 and 4 received toltrazuril orally. Red blood cell measures were determined prior to treatment on day 2 of life and at weaning. Body weights were measured on day 2, 24, 74 and 160 of life.

Results: Iron dextran was non-inferior compared to gleptoferron within a tolerance range of ± 5 g haemoglobin/L. In total, treatment groups did not differ with respect to red blood cell parameters and average daily weight gain. The 50% pigs with intermediate birth weights profited from an additional iron dextran administration with respect to higher haemoglobin concentrations at weaning.

Conclusions: In this investigation gleptoferron and iron dextran appear equally appropriate for prevention of iron deficiency anaemia. Piglets of different birth weights might profit differently from an additional iron administration, so that usage of a product containing iron as a single substance is of advantage to allow a flexible adjustment of dosage during the suckling period.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信