Technology Enhanced Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences in Gynecologic Oncology: Impact on Quality and Education.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Opuruiche Ibekwe, Amma F Agyemang, Carmelo Gaudioso, Kristopher M Attwood, Chukwumere Nwogu, Peter J Frederick
{"title":"Technology Enhanced Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences in Gynecologic Oncology: Impact on Quality and Education.","authors":"Opuruiche Ibekwe, Amma F Agyemang, Carmelo Gaudioso, Kristopher M Attwood, Chukwumere Nwogu, Peter J Frederick","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02556-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) improve patient outcomes. Our goals were to investigate the impact of a technology platform, navify® Clinical Hub for Tumor Boards (nCH) on the quality and educational value of gynecologic oncology MCCs. We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study of the gynecologic oncology MCC at a comprehensive cancer center from 2020 to 2023. Using a validated observational tool, we assessed the quality of case presentation and discussion (as measured by a mean composite score) before and after the introduction of nCH. We also evaluated compliance of care plans with national guidelines, changes in care plans, and concordance of treatment received with MCC recommendations. Surveys and interviews were used to evaluate the educational value of the MCCs. Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC) and Dedoose v9.0.17, (Los Angeles, CA). Pre- and post-nCH cohorts consisted of 49 and 60 patients, respectively. When comparing both cohorts, there was a difference in the mean composite score (50.57 vs 54.11; p = 0.016). Care plans were changed by the MCC in approximately 12% of cases, and MCC recommendations were 93-96% concordant with treatment received, but no statistically significant differences were observed. Additionally, MCC recommendations were 100% compliant with guidelines. Interviews of MCC participants revealed that the post-nCH presentation was more concise and structured. Despite limited use of some nCH features, GYN fellows reported a high educational value of the MCC. nCH improved the quality of the gynecologic oncology MCC and the educational experience of trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02556-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) improve patient outcomes. Our goals were to investigate the impact of a technology platform, navify® Clinical Hub for Tumor Boards (nCH) on the quality and educational value of gynecologic oncology MCCs. We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study of the gynecologic oncology MCC at a comprehensive cancer center from 2020 to 2023. Using a validated observational tool, we assessed the quality of case presentation and discussion (as measured by a mean composite score) before and after the introduction of nCH. We also evaluated compliance of care plans with national guidelines, changes in care plans, and concordance of treatment received with MCC recommendations. Surveys and interviews were used to evaluate the educational value of the MCCs. Analyses were conducted using SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC) and Dedoose v9.0.17, (Los Angeles, CA). Pre- and post-nCH cohorts consisted of 49 and 60 patients, respectively. When comparing both cohorts, there was a difference in the mean composite score (50.57 vs 54.11; p = 0.016). Care plans were changed by the MCC in approximately 12% of cases, and MCC recommendations were 93-96% concordant with treatment received, but no statistically significant differences were observed. Additionally, MCC recommendations were 100% compliant with guidelines. Interviews of MCC participants revealed that the post-nCH presentation was more concise and structured. Despite limited use of some nCH features, GYN fellows reported a high educational value of the MCC. nCH improved the quality of the gynecologic oncology MCC and the educational experience of trainees.

技术增强妇科肿瘤多学科会议:对质量和教育的影响。
多学科癌症会议(mcc)改善了患者的预后。我们的目标是调查一个技术平台,navify®临床中心肿瘤委员会(nCH)对妇科肿瘤mcc的质量和教育价值的影响。我们对某综合癌症中心2020 - 2023年妇科肿瘤MCC进行了一项前瞻性、混合方法研究。使用经过验证的观察工具,我们评估了引入nCH之前和之后的病例报告和讨论的质量(以平均综合评分衡量)。我们还评估了护理计划对国家指南的依从性,护理计划的变化,以及接受的治疗与MCC建议的一致性。采用问卷调查和访谈的方法来评估mcc的教育价值。采用SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC)和Dedoose v9.0.17 (Los Angeles, CA)进行分析。nch前和nch后的队列分别由49名和60名患者组成。当比较两个队列时,平均综合评分存在差异(50.57 vs 54.11;p = 0.016)。在大约12%的病例中,MCC改变了护理计划,MCC建议与所接受治疗的一致性为93-96%,但没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。此外,MCC的建议100%符合指南。对世纪挑战集团参与者的采访显示,nch后的演讲更加简洁和有条理。尽管一些nCH特征的使用有限,但GYN研究员报告了MCC的高教育价值。nCH提高了妇科肿瘤MCC的质量和学员的教育体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信