The forensic medical evaluation of medical malpractice claims in the field of medical pathology.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Mirac Ozdemir, Ferah Karayel, Humman Sen, Mehmet Akif Inanici
{"title":"The forensic medical evaluation of medical malpractice claims in the field of medical pathology.","authors":"Mirac Ozdemir, Ferah Karayel, Humman Sen, Mehmet Akif Inanici","doi":"10.1007/s12024-024-00935-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Just like in other medical specialties, medical malpractice claims arise in pathology as well. Although the exact rate of malpractice related to pathology cannot be clearly stated in Turkey, it is known to occur more frequently during the diagnosis stage, as reported worldwide. This study discusses the measures that should be taken to prevent these claims by comparing cases with alleged malpractice in pathology, evaluated by the Council of Forensic Medicine, with the literature. Reports in which the pathologist or the procedure is directly or indirectly accused and in which a medical malpractice claim related to a pathologist or procedure was questioned, were retrospectively reviewed from the archive by the 7th Specialization Board of the Council of Forensic Medicine. The patients' clinical complaints, the procedures performed, histopathological diagnoses of tissue samples, the court inquiry, the re-evaluation of the slides in the relevant department, and the outcome of the relevant board were analyzed in conjunction with the literature. It was found that the majority of the cases were related to the breast (37.5%) and the urogenital system (37.5%). In seven cases, the court directly questioned the pathologist's fault, while in nine cases, the fault of all doctors was questioned. In two cases, the failure to perform immunohistochemical examination was considered a medical practice error. In the breast cases, the pathologist's diagnosis was incorrect in two cases, and in a lymphoma case, the pathologist's diagnostic error did not cause harm to the patient but was considered a lack of diligence. Improving the working conditions of pathologists, enhancing communication between clinicians and pathologists, having clinicians correlate pathology diagnoses with clinical findings before initiating treatment, and ensuring that immunohistochemical examinations are not neglected in necessary cases are among our medical recommendations. To ensure that the judicial process progresses within a scientific framework, we also recommend the establishment of Specialization Courts dedicated solely to malpractice, as well as the creation of a pool of expert pathologists who are trained and certified to serve as expert witnesses for the courts. Additionally, with future studies, medical malpractice claims related to pathology can be discussed in greater depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12449,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00935-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just like in other medical specialties, medical malpractice claims arise in pathology as well. Although the exact rate of malpractice related to pathology cannot be clearly stated in Turkey, it is known to occur more frequently during the diagnosis stage, as reported worldwide. This study discusses the measures that should be taken to prevent these claims by comparing cases with alleged malpractice in pathology, evaluated by the Council of Forensic Medicine, with the literature. Reports in which the pathologist or the procedure is directly or indirectly accused and in which a medical malpractice claim related to a pathologist or procedure was questioned, were retrospectively reviewed from the archive by the 7th Specialization Board of the Council of Forensic Medicine. The patients' clinical complaints, the procedures performed, histopathological diagnoses of tissue samples, the court inquiry, the re-evaluation of the slides in the relevant department, and the outcome of the relevant board were analyzed in conjunction with the literature. It was found that the majority of the cases were related to the breast (37.5%) and the urogenital system (37.5%). In seven cases, the court directly questioned the pathologist's fault, while in nine cases, the fault of all doctors was questioned. In two cases, the failure to perform immunohistochemical examination was considered a medical practice error. In the breast cases, the pathologist's diagnosis was incorrect in two cases, and in a lymphoma case, the pathologist's diagnostic error did not cause harm to the patient but was considered a lack of diligence. Improving the working conditions of pathologists, enhancing communication between clinicians and pathologists, having clinicians correlate pathology diagnoses with clinical findings before initiating treatment, and ensuring that immunohistochemical examinations are not neglected in necessary cases are among our medical recommendations. To ensure that the judicial process progresses within a scientific framework, we also recommend the establishment of Specialization Courts dedicated solely to malpractice, as well as the creation of a pool of expert pathologists who are trained and certified to serve as expert witnesses for the courts. Additionally, with future studies, medical malpractice claims related to pathology can be discussed in greater depth.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology MEDICINE, LEGAL-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology encompasses all aspects of modern day forensics, equally applying to children or adults, either living or the deceased. This includes forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging, policing, wound assessment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, forensic search, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, and DNA. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology presents a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信