Psychometric evaluation and clinical compatibility of the Turkish version of the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ-T).

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nursena Ulas, Guleser Guney Yilmaz, Barkın Köse
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation and clinical compatibility of the Turkish version of the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ-T).","authors":"Nursena Ulas, Guleser Guney Yilmaz, Barkın Köse","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2449123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to adapt the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ) into Turkish culture and evaluate its psychometric properties in typically developing children aged 4-6 years. This study involved 235 typically developing children and 61 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Parents completed the Turkish CPQ (CPQ-T) and demographic form. The adaptation process followed the World Health Organization's guidelines. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted, and construct validity was assessed using the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test to compare participation levels between typically developing children and those with ASD. Reliability was measured through Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability, with agreement assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and McDonald's ω. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using ROC curves. The study demonstrated significant differences in participation levels between the study group and children with ASD across all domains (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit (CMIN/DF = 2.692, GFI = 0.862, IFI = 0.932). The CPQ showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.978) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.943 to 0.983). Sensitivity and specificity analyses yielded high values, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) ranging from 0.956 to 0.978. The Turkish version of the CPQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing child participation, effectively distinguishing between typically developing children and those with ASD. This study contributes significantly to the limited literature on the CPQ, highlighting its utility in clinical and research settings for evaluating children's participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2449123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to adapt the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ) into Turkish culture and evaluate its psychometric properties in typically developing children aged 4-6 years. This study involved 235 typically developing children and 61 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Parents completed the Turkish CPQ (CPQ-T) and demographic form. The adaptation process followed the World Health Organization's guidelines. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted, and construct validity was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare participation levels between typically developing children and those with ASD. Reliability was measured through Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability, with agreement assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and McDonald's ω. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using ROC curves. The study demonstrated significant differences in participation levels between the study group and children with ASD across all domains (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit (CMIN/DF = 2.692, GFI = 0.862, IFI = 0.932). The CPQ showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.978) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.943 to 0.983). Sensitivity and specificity analyses yielded high values, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) ranging from 0.956 to 0.978. The Turkish version of the CPQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing child participation, effectively distinguishing between typically developing children and those with ASD. This study contributes significantly to the limited literature on the CPQ, highlighting its utility in clinical and research settings for evaluating children's participation.

土耳其版儿童参与问卷(CPQ-T)的心理测量评估与临床相容性。
目的:本研究的目的是使儿童参与问卷(CPQ)适应土耳其文化,并评估其在典型发展儿童4-6岁的心理测量特性。这项研究涉及235名正常发育的儿童和61名患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童。家长完成了土耳其CPQ (CPQ- t)和人口统计表格。适应过程遵循了世界卫生组织的指导方针。进行验证性因子分析(CFA),并使用Mann-Whitney U检验评估结构效度,以比较正常发育儿童和ASD儿童的参与水平。信度通过Cronbach's alpha和重测信度来测量,一致性使用类内相关系数(ICC)和McDonald's ω来评估。采用ROC曲线确定敏感性和特异性。该研究表明,研究组和自闭症儿童在所有领域的参与水平都存在显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信