Photogrammetric evaluation of extended midline strip craniectomy with bilateral parietal osteotomies on frontal morphology in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thomas Rückschloß, Sven Zittel, Elhassan Hassanein, Ahmed El Damaty, Sandro M Krieg, Oliver Ristow, Jürgen Hoffmann, Michael Engel
{"title":"Photogrammetric evaluation of extended midline strip craniectomy with bilateral parietal osteotomies on frontal morphology in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis.","authors":"Thomas Rückschloß, Sven Zittel, Elhassan Hassanein, Ahmed El Damaty, Sandro M Krieg, Oliver Ristow, Jürgen Hoffmann, Michael Engel","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.FOCUS24582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Isolated craniosynostosis of the sagittal suture results in scaphocephaly characterized by a long, narrow skull. Surgical correction of this condition remains debated, particularly regarding the necessity of directly addressing frontal bossing. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of extended strip craniectomy combined with bilateral barrel staving in improving cranial morphology without direct intervention on the forehead.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 81 patients diagnosed with isolated sagittal synostosis, treated surgically at an average age of 5.3 months. Three-dimensional photogrammetric scans were obtained 1 day before surgery and 14 days, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The bossing angle, nasofrontal angle, cephalic index, and vertex ratio were analyzed. A control group of age-matched healthy children was used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in the bossing angle were observed from preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively, indicating that the intervention contributed to a more normalized cranial shape. The cephalic index increased significantly postoperatively, although it remained lower than that of the control group. The nasofrontal angle remained stable across all time points, with minimal differences between the study and control groups. The vertex ratio decreased significantly over time, suggesting a balanced cranial shape. However, persistent differences between the study and control groups suggest that the intervention did not fully normalize cranial morphology in the short to midterm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extended strip craniectomy with bilateral barrel staving, while effective in improving certain aspects of cranial morphology, may not fully equalize cranial shape within the short to midterm. The use of 3D photogrammetry as a noninvasive method for assessing cranial changes is validated in this study and holds promise for broader applications in craniofacial surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 1","pages":"E7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.FOCUS24582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Isolated craniosynostosis of the sagittal suture results in scaphocephaly characterized by a long, narrow skull. Surgical correction of this condition remains debated, particularly regarding the necessity of directly addressing frontal bossing. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of extended strip craniectomy combined with bilateral barrel staving in improving cranial morphology without direct intervention on the forehead.

Methods: This retrospective study included 81 patients diagnosed with isolated sagittal synostosis, treated surgically at an average age of 5.3 months. Three-dimensional photogrammetric scans were obtained 1 day before surgery and 14 days, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The bossing angle, nasofrontal angle, cephalic index, and vertex ratio were analyzed. A control group of age-matched healthy children was used for comparison.

Results: Significant reductions in the bossing angle were observed from preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively, indicating that the intervention contributed to a more normalized cranial shape. The cephalic index increased significantly postoperatively, although it remained lower than that of the control group. The nasofrontal angle remained stable across all time points, with minimal differences between the study and control groups. The vertex ratio decreased significantly over time, suggesting a balanced cranial shape. However, persistent differences between the study and control groups suggest that the intervention did not fully normalize cranial morphology in the short to midterm.

Conclusions: Extended strip craniectomy with bilateral barrel staving, while effective in improving certain aspects of cranial morphology, may not fully equalize cranial shape within the short to midterm. The use of 3D photogrammetry as a noninvasive method for assessing cranial changes is validated in this study and holds promise for broader applications in craniofacial surgery.

扩展中线条形颅骨切除术联合双侧顶骨截骨术对孤立性矢状关节闭锁患者额叶形态的摄影测量评价。
目的:矢状缝的孤立性颅缝闭合导致颅骨长而窄的舟头畸形。这种情况的手术矫正仍然存在争议,特别是关于直接解决额部隆起的必要性。本研究旨在评估扩展条形颅骨切除术联合双侧桶状支架在不直接干预前额的情况下改善颅骨形态的有效性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了81例诊断为孤立性矢状面滑膜闭锁的患者,平均年龄为5.3个月。术前1天、术后14天、3个月、12个月进行三维摄影测量扫描。分析凸角、鼻额角、头侧指数和鼻尖比。以年龄相匹配的健康儿童为对照组进行比较。结果:从术前到术后12个月,观察到凸角明显降低,表明干预有助于更规范的颅骨形状。术后头侧指数明显升高,但仍低于对照组。鼻额角在所有时间点都保持稳定,研究组和对照组之间的差异很小。随着时间的推移,顶点比例明显下降,表明颅骨形状平衡。然而,实验组和对照组之间的持续差异表明,干预在短期到中期并没有完全使颅骨形态正常化。结论:延长条形颅骨切除术联合双侧桶状支架虽然能有效改善颅形态的某些方面,但在中短期内可能无法完全平衡颅形。在这项研究中,3D摄影测量作为一种评估颅骨变化的无创方法得到了验证,并有望在颅面外科手术中得到更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信