Ideological religious nationalism: measurement, construct validity, and cross-cultural comparisons.

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1080/00224545.2024.2441312

Joseph A Wagoner, Sucharita Belavadi, Antonis Gardikiotis, Barbara Barbieri, Matteo Antonini

{"title":"Ideological religious nationalism: measurement, construct validity, and cross-cultural comparisons.","authors":"Joseph A Wagoner, Sucharita Belavadi, Antonis Gardikiotis, Barbara Barbieri, Matteo Antonini","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2024.2441312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ideological religious nationalism (IRN) is a worldview that advocates the integration of religious beliefs with national policy and laws and the religious moralization of politics. However, the psychological mechanisms, individual differences, and socio-political consequences related to IRN are unclear. Across five studies (NTotal = 1,349), we established construct validity for a novel scale assessing IRN that is adaptable across different contexts. Results showed that stronger IRN relates to distinct psychological motives, domains of religiosity, and views of one's nation. Results also showed that stronger IRN relates to supporting policies that promote religious-national integration and support of political violence. Lastly, results show that this novel IRN scale can be used across different contexts and has incremental validity beyond similar but distinct measures of religious nationalism. Overall, results showed that IRN can successfully capture people's integration of their religious beliefs with their views about their nation's identity.","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2441312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ideological religious nationalism (IRN) is a worldview that advocates the integration of religious beliefs with national policy and laws and the religious moralization of politics. However, the psychological mechanisms, individual differences, and socio-political consequences related to IRN are unclear. Across five studies (N_Total = 1,349), we established construct validity for a novel scale assessing IRN that is adaptable across different contexts. Results showed that stronger IRN relates to distinct psychological motives, domains of religiosity, and views of one's nation. Results also showed that stronger IRN relates to supporting policies that promote religious-national integration and support of political violence. Lastly, results show that this novel IRN scale can be used across different contexts and has incremental validity beyond similar but distinct measures of religious nationalism. Overall, results showed that IRN can successfully capture people's integration of their religious beliefs with their views about their nation's identity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

意识形态宗教民族主义：测量、构建有效性和跨文化比较。

意识形态宗教民族主义（IRN）是一种主张将宗教信仰与国家政策、法律、政治的宗教道德化相结合的世界观。然而，与IRN相关的心理机制、个体差异和社会政治后果尚不清楚。在五项研究中（NTotal = 1349），我们建立了一种评估IRN的新型量表的结构效度，该量表可适应不同的背景。结果表明，较强的IRN与不同的心理动机、宗教信仰领域和民族观点有关。结果还表明，更强的IRN与促进宗教-民族融合和支持政治暴力的支持政策有关。最后，结果表明，这种新的IRN量表可以在不同的背景下使用，并且比类似但不同的宗教民族主义测量具有递增的效度。总体而言，结果表明，IRN可以成功地捕捉到人们将其宗教信仰与他们对国家认同的看法相结合的情况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.