Catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy: Do we finally have the magic wand to defeat atrial fibrillation?

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ernesto Cristiano, Hussam Ali, Eduardo Celentano, Riccardo Cappato
{"title":"Catheter ablation using pulsed-field energy: Do we finally have the magic wand to defeat atrial fibrillation?","authors":"Ernesto Cristiano, Hussam Ali, Eduardo Celentano, Riccardo Cappato","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i12.677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation remain suboptimal in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in those with persistent AF, despite decades of research, clinical trials, and technological advancements. Recently, pulsed-field ablation (PFA), a promising non-thermal technology, has been introduced to improve procedural outcomes. Its unique feature of myocardial selectivity offers safety advantages by avoiding potential harm to vulnerable adjacent structures during AF ablation. However, despite the global enthusiasm within the electrophysiology community, recent data indicate that PFA is still far from being a \"magic wand\" for addressing such a complex and challenging arrhythmia as AF. More progress is needed in mapping processes rather than in ablation technology. This editorial reviews relevant available data and explores future research directions for PFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"16 12","pages":"677-682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i12.677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation remain suboptimal in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in those with persistent AF, despite decades of research, clinical trials, and technological advancements. Recently, pulsed-field ablation (PFA), a promising non-thermal technology, has been introduced to improve procedural outcomes. Its unique feature of myocardial selectivity offers safety advantages by avoiding potential harm to vulnerable adjacent structures during AF ablation. However, despite the global enthusiasm within the electrophysiology community, recent data indicate that PFA is still far from being a "magic wand" for addressing such a complex and challenging arrhythmia as AF. More progress is needed in mapping processes rather than in ablation technology. This editorial reviews relevant available data and explores future research directions for PFA.

使用脉冲场能量的导管消融:我们最终有了战胜心房颤动的魔棒吗?
尽管经过数十年的研究、临床试验和技术进步,导管消融术对心房颤动(房颤)患者,尤其是持续性房颤患者的临床疗效仍不理想。最近,脉冲场消融(PFA)这一前景广阔的非热疗技术被引入以改善手术效果。它具有心肌选择性的独特特点,在房颤消融过程中可避免对脆弱的邻近结构造成潜在伤害,因而具有安全优势。然而,尽管全球电生理学界对该技术充满热情,但最近的数据表明,对于像房颤这样复杂且极具挑战性的心律失常,PFA 仍远不是解决这一问题的 "法宝"。我们需要在制图过程而非消融技术方面取得更多进展。这篇社论回顾了现有的相关数据,并探讨了 PFA 未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信