The under-representation of women in cardiovascular clinical trials: State-of-the-art review and ethical considerations.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sonya Burgess, Sarah Zaman, Cindy Towns, Megan Coylewright, F Aaysha Cader
{"title":"The under-representation of women in cardiovascular clinical trials: State-of-the-art review and ethical considerations.","authors":"Sonya Burgess, Sarah Zaman, Cindy Towns, Megan Coylewright, F Aaysha Cader","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review describes and evaluates the representation of women in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCT), it reports significant under-representation of women in clinical trials both as participants and researchers and discusses the ethical implications of under-representation. The under-representation of women as participants in cardiovascular RCTs is evident in trials investigating cardiovascular drugs, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure and interventional procedures and devices. Under-representation of women is also evident in the authorship of cardiovascular clinical trials and in trial leadership roles, and under-representation of women as trial investigators is independently associated with under- recruitment of women as trial participants. A notable lack of RCTs investigating conditions that disproportionately affect women is also evident, this triad of underrepresentation for women as participants, and investigators, and the lack of RCTs into conditions predominantly experienced by women, all contribute to the gender gap in cardiovascular outcomes. Better representation of women in clinical trials, in trial leadership and authorship is a key factor to address to equity, distributive justice and improve outcomes for women with cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review describes and evaluates the representation of women in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCT), it reports significant under-representation of women in clinical trials both as participants and researchers and discusses the ethical implications of under-representation. The under-representation of women as participants in cardiovascular RCTs is evident in trials investigating cardiovascular drugs, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure and interventional procedures and devices. Under-representation of women is also evident in the authorship of cardiovascular clinical trials and in trial leadership roles, and under-representation of women as trial investigators is independently associated with under- recruitment of women as trial participants. A notable lack of RCTs investigating conditions that disproportionately affect women is also evident, this triad of underrepresentation for women as participants, and investigators, and the lack of RCTs into conditions predominantly experienced by women, all contribute to the gender gap in cardiovascular outcomes. Better representation of women in clinical trials, in trial leadership and authorship is a key factor to address to equity, distributive justice and improve outcomes for women with cardiovascular disease.

女性在心血管临床试验中的代表性不足:最新进展回顾与伦理考虑。
本综述描述并评估了妇女在心血管随机对照试验(RCT)中的代表性,报告了妇女作为参与者和研究者在临床试验中的代表性严重不足,并讨论了代表性不足的伦理影响。在研究心血管药物、急性冠状动脉综合症、心力衰竭以及介入手术和器械的临床试验中,女性参与心血管随机对照试验的人数明显不足。女性在心血管临床试验作者和试验领导职位中的代表性不足也很明显,女性在试验研究者中的代表性不足与女性在试验参与者中的招募不足也有独立联系。此外,调查对女性影响尤为严重的疾病的研究性试验也明显不足。女性参与者和研究人员代表性不足,以及缺乏对女性主要经历的疾病的研究性试验,这三者共同导致了心血管疾病结果的性别差距。提高妇女在临床试验、试验领导和作者中的代表性是实现公平、分配公正和改善女性心血管疾病患者治疗效果的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信