A Comparative Review of the SWEET Simulator: Theoretical Verification Against Other Simulators.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Amine Ben-Daoued, Frédéric Bernardin, Pierre Duthon
{"title":"A Comparative Review of the SWEET Simulator: Theoretical Verification Against Other Simulators.","authors":"Amine Ben-Daoued, Frédéric Bernardin, Pierre Duthon","doi":"10.3390/jimaging10120306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate luminance-based image generation is critical in physically based simulations, as even minor inaccuracies in radiative transfer calculations can introduce noise or artifacts, adversely affecting image quality. The radiative transfer simulator, SWEET, uses a backward Monte Carlo approach, and its performance is analyzed alongside other simulators to assess how Monte Carlo-induced biases vary with parameters like optical thickness and medium anisotropy. This work details the advancements made to SWEET since the previous publication, with a specific focus on a more comprehensive comparison with other simulators such as Mitsuba. The core objective is to evaluate the precision of SWEET by comparing radiometric quantities like luminance, which serves as a method for validating the simulator. This analysis is particularly important in contexts such as automotive camera imaging, where accurate scene representation is crucial to reducing noise and ensuring the reliability of image-based systems in autonomous driving. By focusing on detailed radiometric comparisons, this study underscores SWEET's ability to minimize noise, thus providing high-quality imaging for advanced applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"10 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10120306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate luminance-based image generation is critical in physically based simulations, as even minor inaccuracies in radiative transfer calculations can introduce noise or artifacts, adversely affecting image quality. The radiative transfer simulator, SWEET, uses a backward Monte Carlo approach, and its performance is analyzed alongside other simulators to assess how Monte Carlo-induced biases vary with parameters like optical thickness and medium anisotropy. This work details the advancements made to SWEET since the previous publication, with a specific focus on a more comprehensive comparison with other simulators such as Mitsuba. The core objective is to evaluate the precision of SWEET by comparing radiometric quantities like luminance, which serves as a method for validating the simulator. This analysis is particularly important in contexts such as automotive camera imaging, where accurate scene representation is crucial to reducing noise and ensuring the reliability of image-based systems in autonomous driving. By focusing on detailed radiometric comparisons, this study underscores SWEET's ability to minimize noise, thus providing high-quality imaging for advanced applications.

SWEET模拟器的比较综述:与其他模拟器的理论验证。
在基于物理的模拟中,精确的基于亮度的图像生成是至关重要的,因为在辐射传输计算中,即使是很小的不准确性也会引入噪声或伪影,从而对图像质量产生不利影响。辐射传输模拟器SWEET采用了反向蒙特卡罗方法,并与其他模拟器一起分析了其性能,以评估蒙特卡罗诱导的偏差如何随光学厚度和介质各向异性等参数变化。这项工作详细介绍了自上次出版以来在SWEET方面取得的进展,特别侧重于与其他模拟器(如mitsubishi)进行更全面的比较。核心目标是通过比较亮度等辐射量来评估SWEET的精度,这是验证模拟器的一种方法。这种分析在汽车摄像头成像等环境中尤为重要,因为在自动驾驶中,准确的场景表示对于降低噪声和确保基于图像的系统的可靠性至关重要。通过详细的辐射测量比较,本研究强调了SWEET最小化噪声的能力,从而为高级应用提供高质量的成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信