Investigation of the Effects of Ozon and Propolis on the Healing of Bone Defects: An Experimental Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010722
Halil İbrahim Durmuş, Nedim Gunes
{"title":"Investigation of the Effects of Ozon and Propolis on the Healing of Bone Defects: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Halil İbrahim Durmuş, Nedim Gunes","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>This study explores the effects of ozone and propolis on the healing of critically sized bone defects at both the histologic and molecular levels, and the locations and concentrations of osteopontin and osteonectin during healing; both proteins play roles during bone healing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study used 56 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats of an average weight of 350 g, divided into four groups of 14: a control group, a topical ozone group (O), a topical ozone + systemic propolis (O + PO) group, and a systemic propolis group (PO). Seven rats from each group were sacrificed at the end of week 4 and the other seven at the end of week 6. Tissues were subjected to histologic and immunohistochemical examinations in a fixative solution. The results were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS 23 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences-IBM). Results were considered significant at the 95% confidence level ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graft sections were immunostained for osteonectin. Staining was low in the control group but moderate in the other three groups; the differences were significant. The three experimental groups did not differ significantly. Graft sections were also immunostained for osteonectin. At 4 weeks, staining was low in the control group but moderate in the other 3 groups. At 6 weeks, stronger staining was apparent in the 3 experimental groups. At both 4 and 6 weeks, the differences between the control and experimental groups were significantly different, but the differences among the experimental groups were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors' results are compatible with the literature. Ozone and propolis, given separately or together, improved bone healing, increased bone formation, and reduced bone destruction. However, further research is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1383-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: This study explores the effects of ozone and propolis on the healing of critically sized bone defects at both the histologic and molecular levels, and the locations and concentrations of osteopontin and osteonectin during healing; both proteins play roles during bone healing.

Materials and methods: This study used 56 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats of an average weight of 350 g, divided into four groups of 14: a control group, a topical ozone group (O), a topical ozone + systemic propolis (O + PO) group, and a systemic propolis group (PO). Seven rats from each group were sacrificed at the end of week 4 and the other seven at the end of week 6. Tissues were subjected to histologic and immunohistochemical examinations in a fixative solution. The results were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS 23 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences-IBM). Results were considered significant at the 95% confidence level ( P <0.05).

Results: Graft sections were immunostained for osteonectin. Staining was low in the control group but moderate in the other three groups; the differences were significant. The three experimental groups did not differ significantly. Graft sections were also immunostained for osteonectin. At 4 weeks, staining was low in the control group but moderate in the other 3 groups. At 6 weeks, stronger staining was apparent in the 3 experimental groups. At both 4 and 6 weeks, the differences between the control and experimental groups were significantly different, but the differences among the experimental groups were not.

Conclusion: The authors' results are compatible with the literature. Ozone and propolis, given separately or together, improved bone healing, increased bone formation, and reduced bone destruction. However, further research is required.

臭氧和蜂胶对骨缺损愈合影响的实验研究。
背景/目的:本研究从组织学和分子水平探讨臭氧和蜂胶对临界尺寸骨缺损愈合的影响,以及愈合过程中骨桥蛋白和骨粘连蛋白的位置和浓度;这两种蛋白质都在骨愈合过程中发挥作用。材料与方法:选用平均体重350 g的成年雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠56只,分为4组,每组14只:对照组、外用臭氧组(O)、外用臭氧+系统性蜂胶组(O + PO)和系统性蜂胶组(PO)。第4周末,每组取7只大鼠,第6周末取7只大鼠。组织在固定液中进行组织学和免疫组织化学检查。使用SPSS 23 (statistical package for The Social Sciences-IBM)统计软件包对结果进行分析。结果在95%的置信水平上被认为是显著的(结果:移植物切片进行骨连接素免疫染色。对照组染色较低,其余三组染色均为中度;差异是显著的。三个实验组间差异不显著。移植物切片也进行骨连接素免疫染色。4周时,对照组染色较低,其余3组染色中等。6周时,3个实验组的染色均较强。在第4周和第6周,对照组和实验组之间的差异有统计学意义,但实验组之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:作者的结果与文献相符。臭氧和蜂胶,单独或一起给予,促进骨愈合,增加骨形成,减少骨破坏。然而,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信