Impact of Overall and Specific Dimensions of Schizotypy on Theory of Mind.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1159/000542499
Richard A N Glisker, Nicholas Papouchis, Kevin B Meehan, Matthew J Morrison, David Kimhy
{"title":"Impact of Overall and Specific Dimensions of Schizotypy on Theory of Mind.","authors":"Richard A N Glisker, Nicholas Papouchis, Kevin B Meehan, Matthew J Morrison, David Kimhy","doi":"10.1159/000542499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impairments in theory of mind (ToM) are highly prevalent among individuals with schizophrenia, resulting in substantial functional deficits. However, research on impairments in individuals with schizotypy has yielded inconsistent findings, with some studies finding ToM deficits in overall schizotypy, other studies finding ToM deficits in only specific schizotypy dimensions, and yet other studies finding no ToM deficits at all. One potential key factor that may account for this discrepancy is the use of schizotypy measures that do not adequately measure specific schizotypy dimensions. Additional limitations are employment of ToM measures that rely heavily on explicit cultural knowledge, verbal/reading comprehension, and/or other cognitive abilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To address these discrepant findings, we used the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief Revised (Updated; SPQ-BRU) and the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) to tap overall schizotypy and specific schizotypy dimensions. To measure ToM, we used the Frith-Happé animations (FHA) and Strange Stories Film Task (SSFT). We examined the hypothesized negative relationship between schizotypy and ToM in a sample of 233 nonclinical individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis indicated no significant relationship between overall schizotypy and ToM on both the FHA (b = 0.01, t(196) = -0.75, p = 0.46) and SSFT (b = -0.20, t(195) = -1.69, p = 0.09). However, it did find that the negative schizotypy dimension was associated with poorer ToM performance on both the FHA (b = -0.11, t(194) = -2.7, p = 0.008) and SSFT (b = -0.12, t(193) = -3.22, p = 0.001). Also, exploratory analyses employing an extreme-group design approach indicated high schizotypy and high negative schizotypy groups displayed weaker ToM performance within all specific schizotypy dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that ToM impairments are present in schizotypy, especially within the negative schizotypy dimension. The results suggest important methodological implication for studying ToM in schizotypy and conceptualizing the latent structure of schizotypy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impairments in theory of mind (ToM) are highly prevalent among individuals with schizophrenia, resulting in substantial functional deficits. However, research on impairments in individuals with schizotypy has yielded inconsistent findings, with some studies finding ToM deficits in overall schizotypy, other studies finding ToM deficits in only specific schizotypy dimensions, and yet other studies finding no ToM deficits at all. One potential key factor that may account for this discrepancy is the use of schizotypy measures that do not adequately measure specific schizotypy dimensions. Additional limitations are employment of ToM measures that rely heavily on explicit cultural knowledge, verbal/reading comprehension, and/or other cognitive abilities.

Method: To address these discrepant findings, we used the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief Revised (Updated; SPQ-BRU) and the Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) to tap overall schizotypy and specific schizotypy dimensions. To measure ToM, we used the Frith-Happé animations (FHA) and Strange Stories Film Task (SSFT). We examined the hypothesized negative relationship between schizotypy and ToM in a sample of 233 nonclinical individuals.

Results: Regression analysis indicated no significant relationship between overall schizotypy and ToM on both the FHA (b = 0.01, t(196) = -0.75, p = 0.46) and SSFT (b = -0.20, t(195) = -1.69, p = 0.09). However, it did find that the negative schizotypy dimension was associated with poorer ToM performance on both the FHA (b = -0.11, t(194) = -2.7, p = 0.008) and SSFT (b = -0.12, t(193) = -3.22, p = 0.001). Also, exploratory analyses employing an extreme-group design approach indicated high schizotypy and high negative schizotypy groups displayed weaker ToM performance within all specific schizotypy dimensions.

Conclusion: These results indicate that ToM impairments are present in schizotypy, especially within the negative schizotypy dimension. The results suggest important methodological implication for studying ToM in schizotypy and conceptualizing the latent structure of schizotypy.

精神分裂的总体和特定维度对心理理论的影响。
背景:心理理论障碍(ToM)在精神分裂症患者中非常普遍,导致大量的功能缺陷。然而,对分裂型个体的损伤研究得出了不一致的结果,一些研究发现整体分裂型存在ToM缺陷,另一些研究发现ToM缺陷仅存在于特定的分裂型维度,还有一些研究发现根本没有ToM缺陷。一个可能解释这种差异的关键因素是使用的分裂型测量不能充分测量具体的分裂型维度。额外的限制是使用的ToM测量严重依赖于明确的文化知识、口头/阅读理解和/或其他认知能力。方法:为了解决这些差异的发现,我们使用了分裂型人格问卷-简要修订(更新;SPQ-BRU)和多维分裂型量表(MSS)来挖掘整体分裂型和特定分裂型维度。为了测量汤姆,我们使用了快乐动画(FHA)和奇怪故事电影任务(SSFT)。我们在233个非临床个体的样本中检验了分裂型和ToM之间假设的负相关关系。结果:回归分析显示,FHA (b = 0.01, t(196) = -0.75, p = 0.46)和SSFT (b = -0.20, t(195) = -1.69, p = 0.09)与整体分裂型无显著相关。然而,它确实发现负分裂型维度与FHA (b = -0.11, t(194) = -2.7, p = 0.008)和SSFT (b = -0.12, t(193) = -3.22, p = 0.001)上较差的ToM表现相关。此外,采用极端组设计方法的探索性分析表明,高分裂型和高负分裂型组在所有特定分裂型维度中表现出较弱的ToM表现。结论:这些结果表明分裂型中存在ToM损伤,特别是在阴性分裂型维度中。这一结果对研究分裂型的ToM和概念化分裂型的潜在结构具有重要的方法学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信