I'm Getting a Migraine: A Comparative Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Interpretations of Migraine Symptoms.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jakob L Fischer, Anthony M Tolisano, Alvaro I Navarro, Waleed M Abuzeid, Ian M Humphreys, Nadeem A Akbar, Sharan Shah, John S Schneider, Charles A Riley, Edward D McCoul
{"title":"I'm Getting a Migraine: A Comparative Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Interpretations of Migraine Symptoms.","authors":"Jakob L Fischer, Anthony M Tolisano, Alvaro I Navarro, Waleed M Abuzeid, Ian M Humphreys, Nadeem A Akbar, Sharan Shah, John S Schneider, Charles A Riley, Edward D McCoul","doi":"10.31486/toj.24.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients and providers vary in how they describe common otolaryngology-related complaints. These differences can lead to miscommunication and frustration that may affect patient outcomes and satisfaction. The aim of this cross-sectional survey-based study was to explore the differences in migraine symptom selection by otolaryngology patients and clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> Between June 2020 and October 2022, patients and otolaryngology providers at 5 academic medical centers were asked to select as many symptoms as they felt were related to migraine from a list of 28 common symptom terms in 6 domains: headache-related, eye-related, systemic, sinonasal, facial, and ear-related. The primary study outcome was to assess the differences in patient and clinician perceptions of migraine-related symptoms. A secondary outcome was to assess differences by geographic location. <b>Results:</b> A total of 381 patients and 31 otolaryngology clinicians participated. Patients and providers selected a similar number of symptom terms to define migraine, selecting a median of 10 and 11 symptoms, respectively. Otolaryngology clinicians were more likely than patients to define migraine using eye-related symptoms (difference 10.5%; 95% CI 7.4%, 13.6%) and ear-related symptoms (difference 17.2%; 95% CI 3.4%, 31.0%). Patients were more likely to define migraine using facial symptoms (difference -17.3%; 95% CI -34.1%, -0.5%). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to select headache-related, sinonasal, and systemic symptoms when defining migraine. Minor differences were identified based on geographic location. <b>Conclusion:</b> We found differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of migraine. Clinicians were more likely than patients to describe migraine using eye-related and ear-related symptoms, whereas patients were more likely to describe migraine using facial symptoms. These findings have important counseling and communication implications for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"24 4","pages":"262-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.24.0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients and providers vary in how they describe common otolaryngology-related complaints. These differences can lead to miscommunication and frustration that may affect patient outcomes and satisfaction. The aim of this cross-sectional survey-based study was to explore the differences in migraine symptom selection by otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Methods: Between June 2020 and October 2022, patients and otolaryngology providers at 5 academic medical centers were asked to select as many symptoms as they felt were related to migraine from a list of 28 common symptom terms in 6 domains: headache-related, eye-related, systemic, sinonasal, facial, and ear-related. The primary study outcome was to assess the differences in patient and clinician perceptions of migraine-related symptoms. A secondary outcome was to assess differences by geographic location. Results: A total of 381 patients and 31 otolaryngology clinicians participated. Patients and providers selected a similar number of symptom terms to define migraine, selecting a median of 10 and 11 symptoms, respectively. Otolaryngology clinicians were more likely than patients to define migraine using eye-related symptoms (difference 10.5%; 95% CI 7.4%, 13.6%) and ear-related symptoms (difference 17.2%; 95% CI 3.4%, 31.0%). Patients were more likely to define migraine using facial symptoms (difference -17.3%; 95% CI -34.1%, -0.5%). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to select headache-related, sinonasal, and systemic symptoms when defining migraine. Minor differences were identified based on geographic location. Conclusion: We found differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of migraine. Clinicians were more likely than patients to describe migraine using eye-related and ear-related symptoms, whereas patients were more likely to describe migraine using facial symptoms. These findings have important counseling and communication implications for clinicians.

我得了偏头痛:患者和临床医生对偏头痛症状解释的比较评估。
背景:患者和医生在如何描述常见的耳鼻喉科相关投诉方面各不相同。这些差异可能导致沟通不畅和挫折感,从而影响患者的治疗结果和满意度。本研究旨在探讨耳鼻喉科患者和临床医生在偏头痛症状选择上的差异。方法:在2020年6月至2022年10月期间,5个学术医疗中心的患者和耳鼻喉科医生被要求从6个领域的28个常见症状术语中选择尽可能多的与偏头痛相关的症状:头痛相关、眼睛相关、全身、鼻窦、面部和耳朵相关。主要研究结果是评估患者和临床医生对偏头痛相关症状的认知差异。第二个结果是评估地理位置的差异。结果:共有381名患者和31名耳鼻喉科临床医生参与。患者和医生选择相似数量的症状术语来定义偏头痛,分别选择10个和11个症状的中位数。耳鼻喉科临床医生比患者更有可能使用眼部相关症状来定义偏头痛(差异10.5%;95% CI 7.4%, 13.6%)和耳部相关症状(差异17.2%;95% ci 3.4%, 31.0%)。患者更倾向于用面部症状来定义偏头痛(差异-17.3%;95% ci -34.1%, -0.5%)。在定义偏头痛时,耳鼻喉科医生和患者同样可能选择头痛相关、鼻窦和全身症状。根据地理位置确定了细微的差异。结论:我们发现耳鼻喉科医生和他们的患者在偏头痛症状的解释上存在差异。临床医生比患者更有可能用与眼睛和耳朵相关的症状来描述偏头痛,而患者更有可能用面部症状来描述偏头痛。这些发现对临床医生具有重要的咨询和沟通意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信