Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study.

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1177/10870547241307739

Kate Stephens, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton, David Coghill, Christel M Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A Bellgrove, Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H Newcorn, Stacey D Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J Silk

{"title":"Establishing the Research Priorities of ADHD Professionals: An International Delphi Study.","authors":"Kate Stephens, Emma Sciberras, Matthew Bisset, Ainsley Summerton, David Coghill, Christel M Middeldorp, Leanne Payne, Mark A Bellgrove, Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, Jeffery H Newcorn, Stacey D Espinet, Iris Manor, Mohammed M J Alqahtani, Jeremy Varnham, Timothy J Silk","doi":"10.1177/10870547241307739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally.Method: A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (N = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (N = 180).Results: Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions.Conclusion: These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"303-311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241307739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine ADHD research priorities from the perspective of ADHD professionals internationally.

Method: A two-stage modified Delphi design was used. In Stage 1 (qualitative), participants listed research questions relating to ADHD that they perceived to be most important (N = 132). In Stage 2 (quantitative), participants were then asked to rate each research question that was deemed appropriate (able to be researched and not already addressed by research) in terms of perceived importance (N = 180).

Results: Stage 1 generated 382 research questions with 10 broad areas identified for example, co-occurring conditions and treatment, etc. The top 20 most important questions related to ADHD in women/girls, long-term medication use, non-pharmacological interventions, ADHD measurement/rating scales, and efficacy of emotional regulation interventions.

Conclusion: These results can inform an ADHD research agenda which represents the views of the individuals from major ADHD professional groups internationally. Parallel work is needed focusing on research priorities from the perspective of ADHD consumers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

建立ADHD专业人员研究重点：一项国际德尔菲研究。

目的：从国际上ADHD专业人士的角度确定ADHD的研究重点。方法：采用两阶段改进德尔菲设计。在第一阶段（定性），参与者列出他们认为最重要的与ADHD相关的研究问题（N = 132）。在第二阶段（定量），然后要求参与者根据感知到的重要性（N = 180）对每个研究问题进行评级，这些问题被认为是适当的（能够被研究并且尚未被研究解决）。结果：第一阶段产生了382个研究问题，确定了10个广泛的领域，例如，共同发生的条件和治疗等。前20个最重要的问题与妇女/女孩的注意力缺陷多动障碍、长期药物使用、非药物干预、注意力缺陷多动障碍测量/评定量表以及情绪调节干预的有效性有关。结论：这些结果可以为ADHD研究议程提供信息，该议程代表了国际上主要ADHD专业团体的个人观点。需要从注意力缺陷多动障碍消费者的角度关注研究重点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Attention Disorders PSYCHIATRY-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

6.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.