Influence of remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol on non-target lesions progression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1471479
Jing Liu, Tian-Qi Teng, Zheng Li, Feng-Wang Hu, Wei-Wei Sha, Chang-Xian Shen, Yong Xia, Yao-Jun Zhang, Li Liang
{"title":"Influence of remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol on non-target lesions progression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Jing Liu, Tian-Qi Teng, Zheng Li, Feng-Wang Hu, Wei-Wei Sha, Chang-Xian Shen, Yong Xia, Yao-Jun Zhang, Li Liang","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1471479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary lipid therapy target for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, progression of coronary atherosclerosis occurs even LDL-C controlled well, some potentially important factors have been overlooked.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to elucidate the relationship between remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol (RLP-C) and the progression of non-target lesions (NTLs) in patients with well-controlled lipid levels after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 769 CAD patients who underwent PCI and followed up angiography within 6-24 months thereafter. Employing Multivariate Cox regression analysis, we assessed the correlation between RLP-C and NTLs progression. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified the optimal cutoff point for RLP-C, following which the patients were divided into two groups. Propensity score matching balanced confounding factors between groups, and Log-rank tests compared Kaplan-Meier curves for overall follow-up to assess NTLs progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate Cox analysis revealed an independent association between RLP-C and NTLs progression when LDL-C was well-controlled. Additionally, the RLP-C level of 0.555 mmol/L was determined to be the best value for predicting NTLs progression. Following propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated a significantly higher cumulative rate of NTLs progression in patients with RLP-C levels ≥0.555 mmol/L compared to the others (Log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.002). Elevated RLP-C levels were associated with high triglyceride concentrations, diabetes mellitus, and increased risk of revascularization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study illustrated the atherogenic impact of RLP-C in CAD patients. High RLP-C levels increased the risk of revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1471479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1471479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary lipid therapy target for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, progression of coronary atherosclerosis occurs even LDL-C controlled well, some potentially important factors have been overlooked.

Objective: This study aims to elucidate the relationship between remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol (RLP-C) and the progression of non-target lesions (NTLs) in patients with well-controlled lipid levels after PCI.

Methods: This retrospective study included 769 CAD patients who underwent PCI and followed up angiography within 6-24 months thereafter. Employing Multivariate Cox regression analysis, we assessed the correlation between RLP-C and NTLs progression. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified the optimal cutoff point for RLP-C, following which the patients were divided into two groups. Propensity score matching balanced confounding factors between groups, and Log-rank tests compared Kaplan-Meier curves for overall follow-up to assess NTLs progression.

Results: Multivariate Cox analysis revealed an independent association between RLP-C and NTLs progression when LDL-C was well-controlled. Additionally, the RLP-C level of 0.555 mmol/L was determined to be the best value for predicting NTLs progression. Following propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier curves illustrated a significantly higher cumulative rate of NTLs progression in patients with RLP-C levels ≥0.555 mmol/L compared to the others (Log-rank P = 0.002). Elevated RLP-C levels were associated with high triglyceride concentrations, diabetes mellitus, and increased risk of revascularization.

Conclusions: This study illustrated the atherogenic impact of RLP-C in CAD patients. High RLP-C levels increased the risk of revascularization.

残余脂蛋白颗粒胆固醇对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者非靶病变进展的影响。
背景:低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的主要脂质治疗靶点。然而,即使LDL-C控制良好,冠状动脉粥样硬化也会发生进展,一些潜在的重要因素被忽视了。目的:本研究旨在阐明脂质水平控制良好的患者PCI术后残余脂蛋白颗粒胆固醇(RLP-C)与非靶病变(NTLs)进展的关系。方法:回顾性研究769例CAD患者行PCI术后6-24个月血管造影随访。采用多变量Cox回归分析,我们评估了RLP-C与NTLs进展的相关性。根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,我们确定了RLP-C的最佳截止点,然后将患者分为两组。倾向评分匹配各组间的混杂因素,Log-rank检验比较Kaplan-Meier曲线的总体随访,以评估ntl的进展。结果:多因素Cox分析显示,当LDL-C得到良好控制时,RLP-C与NTLs进展之间存在独立关联。此外,0.555 mmol/L的RLP-C水平被确定为预测NTLs进展的最佳值。倾向评分匹配后,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,RLP-C水平≥0.555 mmol/L的患者ntl累积进展率显著高于其他患者(Log-rank P = 0.002)。RLP-C水平升高与高甘油三酯浓度、糖尿病和血运重建风险增加有关。结论:本研究说明了RLP-C对冠心病患者的动脉粥样硬化的影响。高RLP-C水平增加了血运重建的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信