Decoding thoughts, encoding ethics: A narrative review of the BCI-AI revolution

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Thorsten Rudroff
{"title":"Decoding thoughts, encoding ethics: A narrative review of the BCI-AI revolution","authors":"Thorsten Rudroff","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This narrative review aims to analyze mechanisms underlying Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration, evaluate recent advances in signal acquisition and processing techniques, and assess AI-enhanced neural decoding strategies. The review identifies critical research gaps and examines emerging solutions across multiple domains of BCI-AI integration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative review was conducted using major biomedical and scientific databases including PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus (2014–2024). Literature was analyzed to identify key developments in BCI-AI integration, with particular emphasis on recent advances (2019–2024). The review process involved thematic analysis of selected publications focusing on practical applications, technical innovations, and emerging challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recent advances demonstrate significant improvements in BCI-AI systems: 1) High-density electrode arrays achieve spatial resolution up to 5 mm, with stable recordings over 15 months; 2) Deep learning decoders show 40 % improvement in information transfer rates compared to traditional methods; 3) Adaptive algorithms maintain &gt;90 % success rates in motor control tasks over 200-day periods without recalibration; 4) Novel closed-loop optimization frameworks reduce user training time by 55 % while improving accuracy. Latest developments in flexible neural interfaces and self-supervised learning approaches show promise in addressing long-term stability and cross-user generalization challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BCI-AI integration shows remarkable progress in improving signal quality, decoding accuracy, and user adaptation. While challenges remain in long-term stability and user training, advances in adaptive algorithms and feedback mechanisms demonstrate the technology’s growing viability for clinical applications. Recent innovations in electrode technology, AI architectures, and closed-loop systems, combined with emerging standardization frameworks, suggest accelerating progress toward widespread therapeutic use and human augmentation applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1850 ","pages":"Article 149423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899324006784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This narrative review aims to analyze mechanisms underlying Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration, evaluate recent advances in signal acquisition and processing techniques, and assess AI-enhanced neural decoding strategies. The review identifies critical research gaps and examines emerging solutions across multiple domains of BCI-AI integration.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted using major biomedical and scientific databases including PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus (2014–2024). Literature was analyzed to identify key developments in BCI-AI integration, with particular emphasis on recent advances (2019–2024). The review process involved thematic analysis of selected publications focusing on practical applications, technical innovations, and emerging challenges.

Results

Recent advances demonstrate significant improvements in BCI-AI systems: 1) High-density electrode arrays achieve spatial resolution up to 5 mm, with stable recordings over 15 months; 2) Deep learning decoders show 40 % improvement in information transfer rates compared to traditional methods; 3) Adaptive algorithms maintain >90 % success rates in motor control tasks over 200-day periods without recalibration; 4) Novel closed-loop optimization frameworks reduce user training time by 55 % while improving accuracy. Latest developments in flexible neural interfaces and self-supervised learning approaches show promise in addressing long-term stability and cross-user generalization challenges.

Conclusions

BCI-AI integration shows remarkable progress in improving signal quality, decoding accuracy, and user adaptation. While challenges remain in long-term stability and user training, advances in adaptive algorithms and feedback mechanisms demonstrate the technology’s growing viability for clinical applications. Recent innovations in electrode technology, AI architectures, and closed-loop systems, combined with emerging standardization frameworks, suggest accelerating progress toward widespread therapeutic use and human augmentation applications.
解码思想,编码伦理:BCI-AI革命的叙事回顾。
目的:本文旨在分析脑机接口(BCI)和人工智能(AI)集成的机制,评估信号采集和处理技术的最新进展,并评估人工智能增强的神经解码策略。该综述确定了关键的研究差距,并研究了跨BCI-AI集成多个领域的新兴解决方案。方法:对PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore、Scopus等主要生物医学和科学数据库(2014-2024)进行叙述性回顾。对文献进行了分析,以确定BCI-AI集成的关键发展,特别强调了最近的进展(2019-2024)。审查过程涉及对选定出版物的专题分析,重点是实际应用、技术革新和新出现的挑战。结果:最近的进展表明,BCI-AI系统有了显著的改进:1)高密度电极阵列实现了高达5 mm的空间分辨率,稳定记录超过15 个月;2)与传统方法相比,深度学习解码器的信息传输率提高了40% %;3)自适应算法在不重新校准的情况下,在200天的时间内保持bbb90 %的运动控制任务成功率;4)新颖的闭环优化框架在提高准确率的同时,将用户训练时间缩短了55% %。灵活神经接口和自监督学习方法的最新发展显示出解决长期稳定性和跨用户泛化挑战的希望。结论:BCI-AI集成在提高信号质量、解码精度和用户适应性方面取得了显著进展。尽管在长期稳定性和用户培训方面仍然存在挑战,但自适应算法和反馈机制的进步表明,该技术在临床应用中的可行性越来越大。最近在电极技术、人工智能架构和闭环系统方面的创新,加上新兴的标准化框架,表明朝着广泛的治疗应用和人类增强应用加速进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信