Validation of the Korean Version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale Among Patients with Chronic Pain.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Behavioral Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786

Seockhoon Chung, Jiyoung Kim, Dongin Lee, Junseok Ahn, Young Rong Bang, Esther F Afolalu, Seong-Soo Choi, Nicole K Y Tang

{"title":"Validation of the Korean Version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale Among Patients with Chronic Pain.","authors":"Seockhoon Chung, Jiyoung Kim, Dongin Lee, Junseok Ahn, Young Rong Bang, Esther F Afolalu, Seong-Soo Choi, Nicole K Y Tang","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale among patients with chronic pain. Furthermore, we investigated whether pan-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediate the relationship between sleep severity and pain.Methods: Overall, 100 participants with chronic pain were recruited using an anonymous online survey. Their demographic data and responses to pain severity rating scales, comprising the translated Korean version of the PBAS; Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS-16); Metacognition Questionnaire-Insomnia-6 (MCQI-6); and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were collected.Results: The Korean version of the PBAS scale has two-factor structure. The PBAS was a reliable scale which can measure pain-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep among patients with chronic pain. It showed strong convergent validity with pain severity (r = 0.61, p < .001), DBAS-16 (r = 0.65, p < .001), MCQI-6 (r = 0.56, p < .001), and ISI (r = 0.68, p < .001) scores. Mediation analysis indicated that pain severity directly influenced insomnia severity, with PBAS, DBAS-16, and MCQI-6 scores partially mediating this association. Conversely, insomnia severity was associated with pain severity, with the PBAS score alone mediating this relationship.Conclusions: The Korean PBAS is a reliable and valid rating scale which measures pain-specific, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs among patients with chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2024.2441786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pain-related Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep (PBAS) scale among patients with chronic pain. Furthermore, we investigated whether pan-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediate the relationship between sleep severity and pain.

Methods: Overall, 100 participants with chronic pain were recruited using an anonymous online survey. Their demographic data and responses to pain severity rating scales, comprising the translated Korean version of the PBAS; Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep-16 (DBAS-16); Metacognition Questionnaire-Insomnia-6 (MCQI-6); and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), were collected.

Results: The Korean version of the PBAS scale has two-factor structure. The PBAS was a reliable scale which can measure pain-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep among patients with chronic pain. It showed strong convergent validity with pain severity (r = 0.61, p < .001), DBAS-16 (r = 0.65, p < .001), MCQI-6 (r = 0.56, p < .001), and ISI (r = 0.68, p < .001) scores. Mediation analysis indicated that pain severity directly influenced insomnia severity, with PBAS, DBAS-16, and MCQI-6 scores partially mediating this association. Conversely, insomnia severity was associated with pain severity, with the PBAS score alone mediating this relationship.

Conclusions: The Korean PBAS is a reliable and valid rating scale which measures pain-specific, sleep-related dysfunctional beliefs among patients with chronic pain.

查看原文本刊更多论文

韩文慢性疼痛患者睡眠疼痛相关信念与态度量表的验证

目的：评估韩文疼痛相关睡眠信念与态度量表（PBAS）在慢性疼痛患者中的信度和效度。此外，我们还调查了睡眠相关的功能失调信念是否介导了睡眠严重程度和疼痛之间的关系。方法：通过匿名在线调查招募了100名慢性疼痛患者。他们的人口统计数据和对疼痛严重程度评定量表的反应，包括PBAS的韩文翻译版本；关于睡眠-16的功能失调信念和态度失眠元认知问卷-6 (MCQI-6)；和失眠严重指数（ISI）。结果：韩版PBAS量表具有双因素结构。PBAS是一种可靠的量表，可以测量慢性疼痛患者与疼痛相关的睡眠功能失调信念。结论：韩国PBAS量表是一种可靠有效的评估慢性疼痛患者疼痛特异性、睡眠相关功能障碍信念的量表。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral Sleep Medicine CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.