Predictive role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in acute coronary syndrome patients and value of adding global longitudinal strain to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hager Allam, Shaimaa Mostafa, El-Sayed Abd Khalek, Sara Abdalla
{"title":"Predictive role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in acute coronary syndrome patients and value of adding global longitudinal strain to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.","authors":"Hager Allam, Shaimaa Mostafa, El-Sayed Abd Khalek, Sara Abdalla","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Future clinical management would be improved by accurate and early identification of ACS patients at high CV risk. In non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, the prognostic risk of thromboembolism has been evaluated using CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores. It has recently been shown to assess the severity of CAD and foresee patient outcomes. Also, LV global longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of outcome. Our study aimed to determine the added value of LV longitudinal strain (GLS) to CHA₂DS₂-VASc in predicting the outcome and severity of CAD in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 577 patients with primary diagnosis of ACS were included between January and July 2021. All patients had evaluations based on history, clinical examination, 12-lead ECG, TTE, and coronary angiography. Six months follow-up had been provided to all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Syntax score was significantly higher among patients with high-risk CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (30.5 ± 6.1 vs. 17.34 ± 8.7 vs. 11.11 ± 8.2), p-value <0. 001. GLS was significantly lower among high SYNTAX score (-10.97 ± 2.68 vs. -12.61 ± 3.46 vs. -17.81 ± 2.89), p-value = 0.0001. There was a significant negative correlation between the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and GLS. Moreover, adding GLS to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score significantly improved overall accuracy for the prediction of outcome and severity of CAD in ACS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is an easy and simple parameter that can be used in predicting the severity of CAD & adverse clinical outcome in ACS patients and adding GLS to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score significantly improved overall accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2024.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Future clinical management would be improved by accurate and early identification of ACS patients at high CV risk. In non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, the prognostic risk of thromboembolism has been evaluated using CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores. It has recently been shown to assess the severity of CAD and foresee patient outcomes. Also, LV global longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of outcome. Our study aimed to determine the added value of LV longitudinal strain (GLS) to CHA₂DS₂-VASc in predicting the outcome and severity of CAD in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods: A total of 577 patients with primary diagnosis of ACS were included between January and July 2021. All patients had evaluations based on history, clinical examination, 12-lead ECG, TTE, and coronary angiography. Six months follow-up had been provided to all patients.

Results: Syntax score was significantly higher among patients with high-risk CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (30.5 ± 6.1 vs. 17.34 ± 8.7 vs. 11.11 ± 8.2), p-value <0. 001. GLS was significantly lower among high SYNTAX score (-10.97 ± 2.68 vs. -12.61 ± 3.46 vs. -17.81 ± 2.89), p-value = 0.0001. There was a significant negative correlation between the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and GLS. Moreover, adding GLS to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score significantly improved overall accuracy for the prediction of outcome and severity of CAD in ACS patients.

Conclusions: CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is an easy and simple parameter that can be used in predicting the severity of CAD & adverse clinical outcome in ACS patients and adding GLS to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score significantly improved overall accuracy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信