Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties Testing of the Persian Version of the Emergency Department Forensic Nursing Survey.

Somayeh Zare Emami, Zeinab Tabanejad, Abbas Ebadi, Marjan Banazadeh
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties Testing of the Persian Version of the Emergency Department Forensic Nursing Survey.","authors":"Somayeh Zare Emami, Zeinab Tabanejad, Abbas Ebadi, Marjan Banazadeh","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Forensic nursing is an evolving specialty focusing on healthcare when legal issues are involved. Valid tools are needed to assess emergency department (ED) nurses' performance of forensic nursing role behaviors and their corresponding perceptions. We aimed to translate and culturally adapt the original English version of the \"Emergency Department Forensic Nursing Survey\" (EDFNS) into Persian and evaluate its psychometric properties among ED nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological study was conducted in 2022. The EDFNS was translated into Persian. Face and content validity, along with construct validity (exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses) and reliability (internal consistency/test-retest reliability), were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EDFNS-P (EDFNS-Persian) items were appropriate, clear, and relevant in face validity assessment. Content validity was satisfactory for all items (content validity ratio = 0.66/content validity index = 0.92). In total, 274 nurses completed the questionnaires. The EDFNS-P consisted of five factors, namely, identifying forensic cases, acting as a forensic nurse specialist, assisting with legal investigations, providing holistic supportive care, and protecting forensic evidence, explaining 56.49% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis assessment showed a good model fit. The EDFNS-P demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and stability (α = 0.902/intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.938).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concept of forensic nursing role behaviors within Iranian EDs is multidimensional. The EDFNS-P is a 37-item reliable and valid scale. It can help identify areas requiring improvement, promote better collaboration among healthcare professionals, and increase recognition of the specialty. Future studies examining the factor structure in different contexts are suggested to validate the findings. Further research is needed to assess the Persian version of the EDFNS in countries where forensic nursing roles are increasingly emerging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Forensic nursing is an evolving specialty focusing on healthcare when legal issues are involved. Valid tools are needed to assess emergency department (ED) nurses' performance of forensic nursing role behaviors and their corresponding perceptions. We aimed to translate and culturally adapt the original English version of the "Emergency Department Forensic Nursing Survey" (EDFNS) into Persian and evaluate its psychometric properties among ED nurses.

Methods: This methodological study was conducted in 2022. The EDFNS was translated into Persian. Face and content validity, along with construct validity (exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses) and reliability (internal consistency/test-retest reliability), were assessed.

Results: The EDFNS-P (EDFNS-Persian) items were appropriate, clear, and relevant in face validity assessment. Content validity was satisfactory for all items (content validity ratio = 0.66/content validity index = 0.92). In total, 274 nurses completed the questionnaires. The EDFNS-P consisted of five factors, namely, identifying forensic cases, acting as a forensic nurse specialist, assisting with legal investigations, providing holistic supportive care, and protecting forensic evidence, explaining 56.49% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis assessment showed a good model fit. The EDFNS-P demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and stability (α = 0.902/intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.938).

Conclusion: The concept of forensic nursing role behaviors within Iranian EDs is multidimensional. The EDFNS-P is a 37-item reliable and valid scale. It can help identify areas requiring improvement, promote better collaboration among healthcare professionals, and increase recognition of the specialty. Future studies examining the factor structure in different contexts are suggested to validate the findings. Further research is needed to assess the Persian version of the EDFNS in countries where forensic nursing roles are increasingly emerging.

波斯语版急诊科法医护理调查的跨文化适应和心理测量特性检验。
背景:法医护理是一门不断发展的专业,专注于涉及法律问题的医疗保健。需要有效的工具来评估急诊科护士的法医护理角色行为表现及其相应的认知。我们的目的是将“急诊科法医护理调查”(EDFNS)的原始英文版本翻译成波斯语并进行文化改编,并评估其在急诊科护士中的心理测量特性。方法:本方法学研究于2022年进行。EDFNS被翻译成波斯语。评估了面孔效度和内容效度,以及结构效度(探索性/验证性因子分析)和信度(内部一致性/测试-重测信度)。结果:EDFNS-P (EDFNS-Persian)量表内容恰当、清晰、相关性强。所有项目的内容效度均满意(内容效度比= 0.66/内容效度指数= 0.92)。共有274名护士完成了问卷调查。EDFNS-P包括鉴定法医案件、担任法医专科护士、协助法律调查、提供整体支持性护理和保护法医证据五个因素,解释了56.49%的总方差。验证性因子分析评估显示模型拟合良好。EDFNS-P具有良好的内部一致性和稳定性(α = 0.902/类内相关系数= 0.938)。结论:伊朗急诊科法医护理角色行为的概念是多维的。EDFNS-P量表有37个条目,是可靠有效的。它可以帮助确定需要改进的领域,促进医疗保健专业人员之间更好的协作,并提高对专业的认识。未来的研究建议在不同的背景下考察因素结构,以验证研究结果。在法医护理角色日益出现的国家,需要进一步的研究来评估波斯语版的EDFNS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信