Scenario and Shooting Performance in Incumbent Deputy Sheriffs/Police Officers, Cadets, and Cadets Who Worked in Custody/Corrections Facilities.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Robert G Lockie, Michael A Young, Sarah N Lanham, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Thomas R Nagel
{"title":"Scenario and Shooting Performance in Incumbent Deputy Sheriffs/Police Officers, Cadets, and Cadets Who Worked in Custody/Corrections Facilities.","authors":"Robert G Lockie, Michael A Young, Sarah N Lanham, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Thomas R Nagel","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Lockie, RG, Young, MA, Lanham, SN, Orr, RM, Dawes, JJ, and Nagel, TR. Scenario and shooting performance in incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers, cadets, and cadets who worked in custody/corrections facilities. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Job-specific fitness of law enforcement personnel can decline during their careers. Personnel could offset fitness deficiencies with greater skill and knowledge. Cadets in certain counties may work in custody/corrections before their training academy. This study used archival data to compare job-specific scenario performance of incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers (INC; n = 15), cadets entering academy (CAD; n = 19), and cadets entering academy after working in custody/corrections facilities (CADCUST; n = 25). Subjects completed a scenario (step-ups, jumping jacks, sprawls, strikes, drags, sandbag carries, and a simulated fight) as fast as possible followed by a firearms test where they had to hit 6 steel plates. Steel time (time to hit all plates) and number of shots required were recorded. Univariate analysis of covariances, with sex and age as covariates and Bonferroni post hoc analyses, derived between-group differences in all variables (p < 0.05). The CAD group completed the scenario faster than the INC group (p = 0.011). Though not significant, the INC group did have the fastest steel time and lowest number of shots. The CADCUST group completed the scenario 10% slower than the CAD group, was 138-366% slower in steel time, and needed 61-100% more shots than the other groups. The INC group likely had fitness limitations that affected scenario performance but demonstrated better shooting skills. The CADCUST group was slower than the CAD group in the scenario and performed worst in the shooting test. Cadets who work in custody/corrections facilities before academy may require fitness and skill interventions while INC should attempt to maintain their fitness during their career.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Lockie, RG, Young, MA, Lanham, SN, Orr, RM, Dawes, JJ, and Nagel, TR. Scenario and shooting performance in incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers, cadets, and cadets who worked in custody/corrections facilities. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Job-specific fitness of law enforcement personnel can decline during their careers. Personnel could offset fitness deficiencies with greater skill and knowledge. Cadets in certain counties may work in custody/corrections before their training academy. This study used archival data to compare job-specific scenario performance of incumbent deputy sheriffs/police officers (INC; n = 15), cadets entering academy (CAD; n = 19), and cadets entering academy after working in custody/corrections facilities (CADCUST; n = 25). Subjects completed a scenario (step-ups, jumping jacks, sprawls, strikes, drags, sandbag carries, and a simulated fight) as fast as possible followed by a firearms test where they had to hit 6 steel plates. Steel time (time to hit all plates) and number of shots required were recorded. Univariate analysis of covariances, with sex and age as covariates and Bonferroni post hoc analyses, derived between-group differences in all variables (p < 0.05). The CAD group completed the scenario faster than the INC group (p = 0.011). Though not significant, the INC group did have the fastest steel time and lowest number of shots. The CADCUST group completed the scenario 10% slower than the CAD group, was 138-366% slower in steel time, and needed 61-100% more shots than the other groups. The INC group likely had fitness limitations that affected scenario performance but demonstrated better shooting skills. The CADCUST group was slower than the CAD group in the scenario and performed worst in the shooting test. Cadets who work in custody/corrections facilities before academy may require fitness and skill interventions while INC should attempt to maintain their fitness during their career.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信