Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ali Jendoubi , Quentin de Roux , Solène Ribot , Aurore Vanden Bulcke , Camille Miard , Bérénice Tiquet , Bijan Ghaleh , Renaud Tissier , Matthias Kohlhauer , Nicolas Mongardon
{"title":"Fluid management in adult patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A scoping review","authors":"Ali Jendoubi ,&nbsp;Quentin de Roux ,&nbsp;Solène Ribot ,&nbsp;Aurore Vanden Bulcke ,&nbsp;Camille Miard ,&nbsp;Bérénice Tiquet ,&nbsp;Bijan Ghaleh ,&nbsp;Renaud Tissier ,&nbsp;Matthias Kohlhauer ,&nbsp;Nicolas Mongardon","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 155007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124004945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a cardiocirculatory support has tremendously increased in critically ill patients. Although fluid therapy is an essential component of the hemodynamic management of VA-ECMO patients, the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy remains controversial. We performed a scoping review to map out the existing knowledge on fluid management in terms of fluid type, dosing and the impact of fluid balance on VA-ECMO patient outcomes.

Methods

A literature search within PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to April 2024. We included all studies involving critically ill adult patients, supported by VA-ECMO regardless of clinical indication (cardiogenic shock or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation) with or without Renal Replacement Therapy and describing fluid resuscitation strategies or focusing on fluid type or reporting the impact of fluid balance on clinical outcomes and mortality. Details of study population, ECMO indications, fluid types, resuscitation strategies, fluid balance and outcome measures were extracted.

Results

Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 14 clinical studies and two experimental animal studies. We found a lack of studies comparing restrictive and liberal approaches. No study has compared the efficacy and safety of balanced and saline solutions. The place of albumin, as an alternative fluid, should be investigated. Despite their heterogeneity, studies found a negative impact of both early and cumulative fluid overload on survival and renal outcomes.

Conclusions

The available literature on the fluid management in VA-ECMO setting is scarce. More high-quality evidence is needed regarding optimal fluid dosing, type and resuscitation endpoints in order to standardize practice and improve outcomes.

Abstract Image

接受静脉体外膜氧合的成人患者的液体管理:范围回顾。
背景:在危重患者中,静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)作为一种心肺支持手段的使用急剧增加。尽管液体治疗是VA-ECMO患者血流动力学管理的重要组成部分,但最佳液体复苏策略仍存在争议。我们进行了一项范围审查,以从液体类型、剂量和液体平衡对VA-ECMO患者结果的影响方面列出现有的液体管理知识。方法:检索PubMed和EMBASE自建库至2024年4月的文献。我们纳入了所有涉及危重成人患者的研究,无论临床指征(心源性休克或体外心肺复苏)如何支持VA-ECMO,无论是否采用肾脏替代治疗,并描述液体复苏策略或关注液体类型或报告液体平衡对临床结果和死亡率的影响。提取了研究人群、ECMO适应症、液体类型、复苏策略、液体平衡和结果测量的详细信息。结果:16项研究符合纳入标准,包括14项临床研究和2项实验动物研究。我们发现缺乏比较限制和自由方法的研究。没有研究比较过平衡溶液和生理盐水溶液的有效性和安全性。应调查白蛋白作为替代液体的位置。尽管存在异质性,但研究发现,早期和累积的液体过载对生存和肾脏结局都有负面影响。结论:关于VA-ECMO环境下液体管理的文献很少。需要更多关于最佳液体剂量、类型和复苏终点的高质量证据,以便规范实践并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信