Mary E Blair, Elkin A Noguera-Urbano, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero, Andrea Paz, Cristina Lopez-Gallego, María Ángela Echeverry-Galvis, Juan Zuloaga, Pilar Rodríguez, Leonardo Lemus-Mejia, Peter Ersts, Daniel F López-Lozano, Matthew E Aiello-Lammens, Hector M Arango, Leonardo Buitrago, Samuel Chang Triguero, Cristian A Cruz-Rodríguez, Juan F Díaz-Nieto, Dairo Escobar, Valentina Grisales-Betancur, Bethany A Johnson, Jamie M Kass, María C Londoño-Murcia, Cory Merow, Carlos J Muñoz-Rodríguez, María Helena Olaya-Rodríguez, Juan L Parra, Gonzalo E Pinilla-Buitrago, Nicolette S Roach, Octavio Rojas-Soto, Néstor Roncancio-Duque, Erika Suárez-Valencia, J Nicolás Urbina-Cardona, Jorge Velásquez-Tibatá, Camilo A Zapata-Martinez, Robert P Anderson
{"title":"Software codesign between end users and developers to enhance utility for biodiversity conservation.","authors":"Mary E Blair, Elkin A Noguera-Urbano, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero, Andrea Paz, Cristina Lopez-Gallego, María Ángela Echeverry-Galvis, Juan Zuloaga, Pilar Rodríguez, Leonardo Lemus-Mejia, Peter Ersts, Daniel F López-Lozano, Matthew E Aiello-Lammens, Hector M Arango, Leonardo Buitrago, Samuel Chang Triguero, Cristian A Cruz-Rodríguez, Juan F Díaz-Nieto, Dairo Escobar, Valentina Grisales-Betancur, Bethany A Johnson, Jamie M Kass, María C Londoño-Murcia, Cory Merow, Carlos J Muñoz-Rodríguez, María Helena Olaya-Rodríguez, Juan L Parra, Gonzalo E Pinilla-Buitrago, Nicolette S Roach, Octavio Rojas-Soto, Néstor Roncancio-Duque, Erika Suárez-Valencia, J Nicolás Urbina-Cardona, Jorge Velásquez-Tibatá, Camilo A Zapata-Martinez, Robert P Anderson","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biae097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Creating software tools that address the needs of a wide range of decision-makers requires the inclusion of differing perspectives throughout the development process. Software tools for biodiversity conservation often fall short in this regard, partly because broad decision-maker needs may exceed the toolkits of single research groups or even institutions. We show that participatory, collaborative codesign enhances the utility of software tools for better decision-making in biodiversity conservation planning, as demonstrated by our experiences developing a set of integrated tools in Colombia. Specifically, we undertook an interdisciplinary, multi-institutional collaboration of ecological modelers, software engineers, and a diverse profile of potential end users, including decision-makers, conservation practitioners, and biodiversity experts. We leveraged and modified common paradigms of software production, including codesign and agile development, to facilitate collaboration through all stages (including conceptualization, development, testing, and feedback) to ensure the accessibility and applicability of the new tools to inform decision-making for biodiversity conservation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9003,"journal":{"name":"BioScience","volume":"74 12","pages":"867-873"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Creating software tools that address the needs of a wide range of decision-makers requires the inclusion of differing perspectives throughout the development process. Software tools for biodiversity conservation often fall short in this regard, partly because broad decision-maker needs may exceed the toolkits of single research groups or even institutions. We show that participatory, collaborative codesign enhances the utility of software tools for better decision-making in biodiversity conservation planning, as demonstrated by our experiences developing a set of integrated tools in Colombia. Specifically, we undertook an interdisciplinary, multi-institutional collaboration of ecological modelers, software engineers, and a diverse profile of potential end users, including decision-makers, conservation practitioners, and biodiversity experts. We leveraged and modified common paradigms of software production, including codesign and agile development, to facilitate collaboration through all stages (including conceptualization, development, testing, and feedback) to ensure the accessibility and applicability of the new tools to inform decision-making for biodiversity conservation planning.
期刊介绍:
BioScience is a monthly journal that has been in publication since 1964. It provides readers with authoritative and current overviews of biological research. The journal is peer-reviewed and heavily cited, making it a reliable source for researchers, educators, and students. In addition to research articles, BioScience also covers topics such as biology education, public policy, history, and the fundamental principles of the biological sciences. This makes the content accessible to a wide range of readers. The journal includes professionally written feature articles that explore the latest advancements in biology. It also features discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), and columns on policy (Washington Watch) and education (Eye on Education).