Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann
{"title":"[A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].","authors":"Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann","doi":"10.1055/a-2477-3639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2477-3639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.
Methods: Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.
Results: Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.
Conclusion: Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.