[A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2477-3639

Peter Brieger, Luisa Klocke, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Martin Holzke, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Reinhold Kilian, Jürgen Timm, Stefan Weinmann, Tamara Waldmann, Johanna Zur Verth, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Johannes Hamann

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Different access routes to inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT) were examined.

Methods: Baseline differences were examined using exploratory group comparisons, treatment effects by type of admission using regression analysis.

Results: Of 200 StäB users, 144 (72%) were admitted directly to IEHT, while 56 (28%) were transferred. Direct admissions showed a higher prevalence of affective disorders, while transfers more often had schizophrenia. There were no relevant differences in terms of treatment effects.

Conclusion: Access to IEHT treatment is used flexibly, treatment outcomes do not differ significantly. Outreach services should be designed even more flexible.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[直接入院接受相当于住院病人的家庭治疗与从精神科病房转院的比较]。

目的：探讨住院等效家庭治疗（IEHT）的不同获取途径。方法：基线差异采用探索性组比较，不同入院类型的治疗效果采用回归分析。结果：200例StäB用户中，144例（72%）直接入院，56例（28%）转院。直接入院的人患情感障碍的比例更高，而转院的人患精神分裂症的比例更高。两组治疗效果无相关差异。结论：灵活使用IEHT治疗方法，治疗效果无显著差异。外联服务的设计应更加灵活。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

9.10%

发文量

103

期刊介绍： Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien