Revolutionizing Laminate Veneer Bonding: Laser Versus Acid Etching of Enamel.

Khaled Abid Althaqafi
{"title":"Revolutionizing Laminate Veneer Bonding: Laser Versus Acid Etching of Enamel.","authors":"Khaled Abid Althaqafi","doi":"10.11607/prd.7384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is designed to explore the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser tooth etching versus that of conventional tooth surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six maxillary premolars were assigned to two groups (n = 38) according to the type of enamel surface treatment approach. Group 1: samples treated with the conventional acid-etch protocol. Group 2: samples subjected to Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Light-curing resin cement was used to bond the restoration to the tooth and specimens were thermocycled for 30,000 cycles. Shear bond strength testing was conducted on all the specimens. The samples were observed using a scanning electron microscope to record enamel topography and a stereomicroscope to monitor the mode of failure. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the acidetch and laser enamel surface treatment groups for the shear bond strength values at maximum load (MPa) (p-value = .627). There was a significantly higher proportion of cohesive failure in the acid-etch group compared to the laser treatment group and a significantly lower proportion of mixed failure in group 1 compared to group 2 (p-value = .022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concerning the bond strength of the laminate veneer, the effects of laser and traditional acid etching on the enamel surface were the same. Enamel surfaces can be successfully etched using a laser as an alternative to the traditional acid-etch method.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study is designed to explore the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser tooth etching versus that of conventional tooth surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers.

Methods: Seventy-six maxillary premolars were assigned to two groups (n = 38) according to the type of enamel surface treatment approach. Group 1: samples treated with the conventional acid-etch protocol. Group 2: samples subjected to Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Light-curing resin cement was used to bond the restoration to the tooth and specimens were thermocycled for 30,000 cycles. Shear bond strength testing was conducted on all the specimens. The samples were observed using a scanning electron microscope to record enamel topography and a stereomicroscope to monitor the mode of failure. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the acidetch and laser enamel surface treatment groups for the shear bond strength values at maximum load (MPa) (p-value = .627). There was a significantly higher proportion of cohesive failure in the acid-etch group compared to the laser treatment group and a significantly lower proportion of mixed failure in group 1 compared to group 2 (p-value = .022).

Conclusions: Concerning the bond strength of the laminate veneer, the effects of laser and traditional acid etching on the enamel surface were the same. Enamel surfaces can be successfully etched using a laser as an alternative to the traditional acid-etch method.

层压板贴面粘接的革新:激光与酸蚀刻珐琅质的对比。
目的:探讨Er,Cr:YSGG激光牙面蚀刻与常规牙面处理对陶瓷贴面剪切结合强度的影响。方法:76颗上颌前磨牙按牙釉质表面处理方式分为两组(n = 38)。第一组:采用常规酸蚀方案处理的样品。第二组:Er,Cr:YSGG激光处理样品。使用光固化树脂水泥将修复体与牙齿结合,并对标本进行30,000次热循环。对所有试件进行了剪切粘结强度试验。用扫描电镜记录牙釉质形貌,用体视显微镜监测牙釉质破坏模式。P≤0.05被认为是显著的。结果:酸切组与激光牙釉质表面处理组在最大载荷(MPa)下的剪切结合强度值差异无统计学意义(p值= .627)。酸蚀组内聚失败比例明显高于激光治疗组,1组混合性失败比例明显低于2组(p值= 0.022)。结论:激光与传统酸蚀对牙釉质表面的粘接强度影响相同。搪瓷表面可以成功地蚀刻使用激光作为替代传统的酸蚀刻方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信